Brett Kavanaugh’s accuser Christine Ford called for the FBI to investigate her allegations of sexual misconduct, and the fact that such an investigation would be out of the Bureau’s jurisdiction would be the least of her worries.
For starters, an FBI investigation examining allegations surrounding an event that happened in the 1980s would simply involve interviewing all witnesses identified. When the FBI investigated sexual misconduct allegations against Clarence Thomas (which were in their jurisdiction, as they alleged to have occurred in Federal buildings), the investigation amounted to interviewing witnesses. So, more importantly, such an investigation would only solidify a case against Ford.
How do I know that? Because every single witness to the alleged Kavanaugh incident has denied that it occurred – and each of them denied as much under oath. Two of the four witnesses who denied Ford’s account share her left-wing politics. The only person who still has yet to offer any sort of testimony under oath is Christine Ford. And that’s not all. We’re just learning that the Washington Post deliberately withheld witness testimony that exonerates Kavanaugh.
The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberly Strassel blew the lid off that secrecy last night in an explosive series of posts she made public on Twitter. It has to do with Leland Ingham Keyser, a friend of Christine Ford who contradicted her account. Despite that contradiction, the Washington Post excluded that very fact and played Keyser off as a forgetful friend.
2) The email wants a comment from him. The subsequent story would reveal Christine Ford's name, and give details of the supposed "assault."
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
4) This matters for two big reasons–Ford's credibility and WaPo's. The subsequent WaPo story would go on to cite Ford's name and details, and also list notes from a therapist that Ford told this to in 2012. Read carefully what WaPo reports, the same day it emails Judge:
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
6) Wait, say what? WaPo reports publicly that Ford says it was "four boys,"even after WaPo reporter tells Judge that Ford had told her it was three boys and a girl.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
So, why did the Post report that it was four boys at the party, in contradiction with what Ford told them? Because the Post did interview the one girl Ford said was present, and it contradicted her narrative.
8) Other problem: WaPo's reporting. Reporter has for a week had the names of those Ford listed as present. One is a woman. Yet it writes a story saying FOUR BOYS. Why? Maybe a mistake. But if so, why did WaPo never correct that narrative?
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
10) In its most recent update tonight, WaPo writes: "Before her name became public, Ford told The Post she did not think Keyser would remember the party because nothing remarkable had happened there, as far as Keyser was aware."
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
11) Wow. "Before her name became public, Ford told…" That is WaPo admitting that it had the name, and had Ford's response to what would clearly be a Keyser denial, but NEVER PUT IT OUT THERE. Again, why? A lot of people have a lot questions to answer.
— Kimberley Strassel (@KimStrassel) September 23, 2018
Keyser also penned a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee denying Ford’s account, which she’d (Keyser) be liable under penalty of perjury if she’s being untruthful. Speaking through her lawyer, the letter said that “Simply put, Ms. Keyser does not know Mr. Kavanaugh and she has no recollection of ever being at a party or gathering where he was present, with, or without, Dr. Ford.”
Regardless of the truth of her allegations, it’s undeniable that Ford has done everything she can to delay the inevitable confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh. When she requested the FBI investigate her claims, that was after the FBI already said they would not be investigating them. And given that the FBI’s investigation would amount to re-interviewing people who already have been interviewed, what would be the point, if not to delay?
Furthermore, Ford has come up with some truly bizarre excuses that are verifiably false. Among one of her excuses for not coming to D.C. to testify is that she doesn’t like flying.
Christine Blasey Ford claimed she couldn't make it to hearing Monday because of a fear of flying—a result of the alleged attack. So, how did she get to the internship in Hawaii the NYT reported about?https://t.co/aQMzOY5xHY #ConfirmKavanaughNow pic.twitter.com/7pgWmys3cZ
— Matt Margolis (@mattmargolis) September 22, 2018
Did she swim to the mid Atlantic or did she develop a fear of flying in two and a half months? pic.twitter.com/9Yo8p9was2
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) September 24, 2018
After much delay, Ford will testify against Kavanaugh on Thursday on her terms.
It’s her word against every single other witness that she herself identified.
The resistance from the left is not logical nor is the argument to hold up Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Don’t they realize President Trump will simply nominate another conservative in Kavanaugh’s place if he is not confirmed? And what happens if the next opening to the Supreme Court President Trump nominates a conservative woman? Will the sexually abused men come out against her? Another Supreme Court Justice will most likely be needed before this President’s term is up.
The resistance from the left is not logical nor is the argument to hold up Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Don’t they realize President Trump will simply nominate another conservative in Kavanaugh’s place if he is not confirmed? And what happens if the next opening to the Supreme Court President Trump nominates a conservative woman? Will the sexually abused men come out against her? Another Supreme Court Justice will most likely be needed before this President’s term is up.
The Washington Post is big time “Fake News” and listed on the official Wikileaks fake news list . Nothing the WashPost reports is ever credible.
Along with the WashPost the other sources listed on the Wikileaks fake news list are below , all of them are NEVER TO BE TRUSTED.
WIKILEAKS HAS NEVER HAD TO RETRACT ANYTHING EVER FOR INACCURACIES SO IF IT’S LISTED IT’S FAKE NEWS .
CNN, ABC,CBS,NBC,MSNBC,HUFFPOST,NYT,WASHPOST,BUZZFEED, POLITICO, NEWSWEEK,THE AP, THE HILL , ROLLING STONE,SKY NEWS,BI, TIME,USA TODAY, BBC NEWS, LA TIMES,REUTERS,THE BOSTON GLOBE,VOX,THE MIAMI HERALD , MOTHER JONES,HLN, YAHOO, WSJ, NY DAILY NEWS, VICE,UNIVISION, PEOPLE MAGAZINE,PBS,NPR,NEW YORKER MAGAZINE,NATIONAL JOURNAL ,DAILY BEAST,BLOOMBERG,AURN,
Unfortunately, like so much else in our society these days, this whole stinking sewer of unsubstantiated innuendo smells like a political hatchet job for the purpose of keeping an originalist judge off the SCOTUS. But even if it wasn’t, why exactly do the alleged events of 36 years ago amount to a disqualification for judge Kavanaugh? Much more serious, recent, and provable charges didn’t disqualify Bill Clinton from being POTUS because, according to Democrats of the day, it was “just sex” and didn’t justify impeachment. And of course there’s the even more despicable case of Democrat Teddy Kennedy, the “Lion of the Senate”, who left Mary Jo Kopechne to drown while he covered his own sorry ass. Were the Democrats outraged about that? Evidently not. But of course none of that is relevant, right? These people are beyond incredible. And now the notoriously objective New York Times, in its relentless effort to carry the Democrats’ water on this issue, has dug up some vague references to a girl named Renate in a few Georgetown Prep yearbooks, including Brett Kavanaugh’s, and tried to blow it up into a storm of sexism and (gasp! shriek!) insensitivity! Thus proving, of course, that Kavanaugh is guilty of sexual assault on CBF. I mean, hell, any guy who showed insensitivity toward girls as a 17 year-old high school student in the 1980s must, perforce, be a sexual predator and therefore unfit for a seat on the SCOTUS bench. What could be more obvious? Jesus!
Unfortunately, like so much else in our society these days, this whole stinking sewer of unsubstantiated innuendo smells like a political hatchet job for the purpose of keeping an originalist judge off the SCOTUS. But even if it wasn’t, why exactly do the alleged events of 36 years ago amount to a disqualification for judge Kavanaugh? Much more serious, recent, and provable charges didn’t disqualify Bill Clinton from being POTUS because, according to Democrats of the day, it was “just sex” and didn’t justify impeachment. And of course there’s the even more despicable case of Democrat Teddy Kennedy, the “Lion of the Senate”, who left Mary Jo Kopechne to drown while he covered his own sorry ass. Were the Democrats outraged about that? Evidently not. But of course none of that is relevant, right? These people are beyond incredible. And now the notoriously objective New York Times, in its relentless effort to carry the Democrats’ water on this issue, has dug up some vague references to a girl named Renate in a few Georgetown Prep yearbooks, including Brett Kavanaugh’s, and tried to blow it up into a storm of sexism and (gasp! shriek!) insensitivity! Thus proving, of course, that Kavanaugh is guilty of sexual assault on CBF. I mean, hell, any guy who showed insensitivity toward girls as a 17 year-old high school student in the 1980s must, perforce, be a sexual predator and therefore unfit for a seat on the SCOTUS bench. What could be more obvious? Jesus!
Schumer had said he would stop Kavanaugh at all cost and thats what we see here, DEM’ don’t want the court leaning consecrative how stupid of them, when we the people see a very best qualified man for the court we demand he be there for we the people that include our dumb Dem’s who ditch any effort to not allow what the people want via POTUS nomination, if the DEM’S PUSH THIS SO AS TO NOT CONFIRM THEN, VOTING FOR DEM’S WILL BE NIL .
Schumer had said he would stop Kavanaugh at all cost and thats what we see here, DEM’ don’t want the court leaning consecrative how stupid of them, when we the people see a very best qualified man for the court we demand he be there for we the people that include our dumb Dem’s who ditch any effort to not allow what the people want via POTUS nomination, if the DEM’S PUSH THIS SO AS TO NOT CONFIRM THEN, VOTING FOR DEM’S WILL BE NIL .
Look at the chronology. Fiord makes her accusations. Then note from her therapist are exposed in which the therapist notes Ford claimed there were “4 boys'” involved. Immediately after that Ford AND her husband come forward and say the therapist was wrong or mistaken – Ford had said there were only “2 boys”. Then Ford goes on to name “3 boys” she conveniently does not remember the “FOURTH BOY” just like the therapist notes had indicted – and the boy who’s home that this supposed party took place at. NONE of the witnesses she named can collaborate her story – again the media says the witnesses are wrong – just like the therapist? This woman’s lies fall apart faster than she can tell them. She wanted to testify immediately and her lawyer (loose term for her) said they were ready to go. They have been back peddling ever since with one excuse after another then making demands before testifying? Ford has NO case and her phony lawyer knows it too.
Look at the chronology. Fiord makes her accusations. Then note from her therapist are exposed in which the therapist notes Ford claimed there were “4 boys'” involved. Immediately after that Ford AND her husband come forward and say the therapist was wrong or mistaken – Ford had said there were only “2 boys”. Then Ford goes on to name “3 boys” she conveniently does not remember the “FOURTH BOY” just like the therapist notes had indicted – and the boy who’s home that this supposed party took place at. NONE of the witnesses she named can collaborate her story – again the media says the witnesses are wrong – just like the therapist? This woman’s lies fall apart faster than she can tell them. She wanted to testify immediately and her lawyer (loose term for her) said they were ready to go. They have been back peddling ever since with one excuse after another then making demands before testifying? Ford has NO case and her phony lawyer knows it too.
Kubuki theater
Kubuki theater
And just watch . . . all of this will soon ‘come’ to a ‘head’ . . .!
(oops . . . sorry ’bout that)
And just watch . . . all of this will soon ‘come’ to a ‘head’ . . .!
(oops . . . sorry ’bout that)
The accused always has to answer to a non charge. It happens all the time. In Bizarro World, the home of Democrats.
The accused always has to answer to a non charge. It happens all the time. In Bizarro World, the home of Democrats.
The entire Kavanaugh / Ford nonsense is just that. Uncorroborated BS simply meant to delay the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. So unethical and immoral. Unbelievable behavior from Senator’s who wish to be respected. Are they completely nuts? Guess so!!
The entire Kavanaugh / Ford nonsense is just that. Uncorroborated BS simply meant to delay the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. So unethical and immoral. Unbelievable behavior from Senator’s who wish to be respected. Are they completely nuts? Guess so!!
I have a PHD. I keep it in my shed. That is where usable Post Hole Diggers belong.
I have a PHD. I keep it in my shed. That is where usable Post Hole Diggers belong.
I know lots of PHDs in real scienses and NONE of them insist on being called Doctor. What a phoney!
So, these alleged “witnesses” – who really have nothing to lose by telling the truth – would prefer committing perjury? Remember, it wasn’t the so-called “alt right” that brought her associates into the picture – it was their “friend”, Blasey-Ford! She had to continue to embellish her story, so she named people she assumed were “reliable.” Turns out, they may have a lot more integrity than she does. They also aren’t being paid for their assistance. I’ll wager that if any real investigative reporter decided to look at Ford’s lifestyle and finances, they’ll find someone whose spending habits made her an easy mark.
And death threats seem to be the purview of the left. How many has the Kavanaugh family received, even before Ford came forward? The left truly believes that if facts and data don’t support their belief system, then thuggery will.
Of course, the WaPo didn’t look into the obvious – why her therapist didn’t follow through with the mandated reporting that s/he is required to do when a client advises of a crime committed. This law was put into place specifically to help victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, who may be reluctant to press charges against their accuser. The state of Maryland has no statute of limitations on sexual assault charges, so there would have been a police report if there had been any validity to the story to begin with. And had there been, the six investigations of Kavanaugh’s background by the FBI might have run across the information.
So, here are the facts. We have a confirmed alcoholic who was quite sexually active in high school going to a therapist, presumably due to marital problems as her husband was also involved in the therapy. She alleges that she was nearly raped – but can’t recall any details. No report of this alleged assault was made by the therapist, who is required to do so in order to keep his / her license. Then, she suddenly remembers the names of people who were at the party – four years after her initial report. None of those individuals remember anything of the sort.
No thinking person would look at this woman as a reliable or reputable witness to anything!
So, these alleged “witnesses” – who really have nothing to lose by telling the truth – would prefer committing perjury? Remember, it wasn’t the so-called “alt right” that brought her associates into the picture – it was their “friend”, Blasey-Ford! She had to continue to embellish her story, so she named people she assumed were “reliable.” Turns out, they may have a lot more integrity than she does. They also aren’t being paid for their assistance. I’ll wager that if any real investigative reporter decided to look at Ford’s lifestyle and finances, they’ll find someone whose spending habits made her an easy mark.
And death threats seem to be the purview of the left. How many has the Kavanaugh family received, even before Ford came forward? The left truly believes that if facts and data don’t support their belief system, then thuggery will.
Of course, the WaPo didn’t look into the obvious – why her therapist didn’t follow through with the mandated reporting that s/he is required to do when a client advises of a crime committed. This law was put into place specifically to help victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, who may be reluctant to press charges against their accuser. The state of Maryland has no statute of limitations on sexual assault charges, so there would have been a police report if there had been any validity to the story to begin with. And had there been, the six investigations of Kavanaugh’s background by the FBI might have run across the information.
So, here are the facts. We have a confirmed alcoholic who was quite sexually active in high school going to a therapist, presumably due to marital problems as her husband was also involved in the therapy. She alleges that she was nearly raped – but can’t recall any details. No report of this alleged assault was made by the therapist, who is required to do so in order to keep his / her license. Then, she suddenly remembers the names of people who were at the party – four years after her initial report. None of those individuals remember anything of the sort.
No thinking person would look at this woman as a reliable or reputable witness to anything!
sorry alt far left.
how about all the death threats from the alt right to the wife and daughters of Brett Kavanaugh. talk about the pot calling the kettle a dark color.(pc version) and the truth is always subjected and twisted to the far left desire and narative.
how about all the death threats from the alt right to the wife and daughters of Brett Kavanaugh. talk about the pot calling the kettle a dark color.(pc version) and the truth is always subjected and twisted to the far left desire and narative.
Of course no one is going to admit being a witness to this event. Between questions from the left about why they didn’t say anything and the inevitable death threats from the right, who needs the trouble in their life?
The resistance from the left is not logical nor is the argument to hold up Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. Don’t they realize President Trump will simply nominate another conservative in Kavanaugh’s place if he is not confirmed? And what happens if the next opening to the Supreme Court President Trump nominates a conservative woman? Will the sexually abused men come out against her? Another Supreme Court Justice will most likely be needed before this President’s term is up.
The Washington Post is big time “Fake News” and listed on the official Wikileaks fake news list . Nothing the WashPost reports is ever credible.
Along with the WashPost the other sources listed on the Wikileaks fake news list are below , all of them are NEVER TO BE TRUSTED.
WIKILEAKS HAS NEVER HAD TO RETRACT ANYTHING EVER FOR INACCURACIES SO IF IT’S LISTED IT’S FAKE NEWS .
CNN, ABC,CBS,NBC,MSNBC,HUFFPOST,NYT,WASHPOST,BUZZFEED, POLITICO, NEWSWEEK,THE AP, THE HILL , ROLLING STONE,SKY NEWS,BI, TIME,USA TODAY, BBC NEWS, LA TIMES,REUTERS,THE BOSTON GLOBE,VOX,THE MIAMI HERALD , MOTHER JONES,HLN, YAHOO, WSJ, NY DAILY NEWS, VICE,UNIVISION, PEOPLE MAGAZINE,PBS,NPR,NEW YORKER MAGAZINE,NATIONAL JOURNAL ,DAILY BEAST,BLOOMBERG,AURN,
Unfortunately, like so much else in our society these days, this whole stinking sewer of unsubstantiated innuendo smells like a political hatchet job for the purpose of keeping an originalist judge off the SCOTUS. But even if it wasn’t, why exactly do the alleged events of 36 years ago amount to a disqualification for judge Kavanaugh? Much more serious, recent, and provable charges didn’t disqualify Bill Clinton from being POTUS because, according to Democrats of the day, it was “just sex” and didn’t justify impeachment. And of course there’s the even more despicable case of Democrat Teddy Kennedy, the “Lion of the Senate”, who left Mary Jo Kopechne to drown while he covered his own sorry ass. Were the Democrats outraged about that? Evidently not. But of course none of that is relevant, right? These people are beyond incredible. And now the notoriously objective New York Times, in its relentless effort to carry the Democrats’ water on this issue, has dug up some vague references to a girl named Renate in a few Georgetown Prep yearbooks, including Brett Kavanaugh’s, and tried to blow it up into a storm of sexism and (gasp! shriek!) insensitivity! Thus proving, of course, that Kavanaugh is guilty of sexual assault on CBF. I mean, hell, any guy who showed insensitivity toward girls as a 17 year-old high school student in the 1980s must, perforce, be a sexual predator and therefore unfit for a seat on the SCOTUS bench. What could be more obvious? Jesus!
Schumer had said he would stop Kavanaugh at all cost and thats what we see here, DEM’ don’t want the court leaning consecrative how stupid of them, when we the people see a very best qualified man for the court we demand he be there for we the people that include our dumb Dem’s who ditch any effort to not allow what the people want via POTUS nomination, if the DEM’S PUSH THIS SO AS TO NOT CONFIRM THEN, VOTING FOR DEM’S WILL BE NIL .
Look at the chronology. Fiord makes her accusations. Then note from her therapist are exposed in which the therapist notes Ford claimed there were “4 boys'” involved. Immediately after that Ford AND her husband come forward and say the therapist was wrong or mistaken – Ford had said there were only “2 boys”. Then Ford goes on to name “3 boys” she conveniently does not remember the “FOURTH BOY” just like the therapist notes had indicted – and the boy who’s home that this supposed party took place at. NONE of the witnesses she named can collaborate her story – again the media says the witnesses are wrong – just like the therapist? This woman’s lies fall apart faster than she can tell them. She wanted to testify immediately and her lawyer (loose term for her) said they were ready to go. They have been back peddling ever since with one excuse after another then making demands before testifying? Ford has NO case and her phony lawyer knows it too.
Kubuki theater
And just watch . . . all of this will soon ‘come’ to a ‘head’ . . .!
(oops . . . sorry ’bout that)
The accused always has to answer to a non charge. It happens all the time. In Bizarro World, the home of Democrats.
The entire Kavanaugh / Ford nonsense is just that. Uncorroborated BS simply meant to delay the confirmation of Judge Kavanaugh. So unethical and immoral. Unbelievable behavior from Senator’s who wish to be respected. Are they completely nuts? Guess so!!
I know lots of PHDs in real scienses and NONE of them insist on being called Doctor. What a phoney!
I have a PHD. I keep it in my shed. That is where usable Post Hole Diggers belong.
Of course no one is going to admit being a witness to this event. Between questions from the left about why they didn’t say anything and the inevitable death threats from the right, who needs the trouble in their life?
how about all the death threats from the alt right to the wife and daughters of Brett Kavanaugh. talk about the pot calling the kettle a dark color.(pc version) and the truth is always subjected and twisted to the far left desire and narative.
sorry alt far left.
So, these alleged “witnesses” – who really have nothing to lose by telling the truth – would prefer committing perjury? Remember, it wasn’t the so-called “alt right” that brought her associates into the picture – it was their “friend”, Blasey-Ford! She had to continue to embellish her story, so she named people she assumed were “reliable.” Turns out, they may have a lot more integrity than she does. They also aren’t being paid for their assistance. I’ll wager that if any real investigative reporter decided to look at Ford’s lifestyle and finances, they’ll find someone whose spending habits made her an easy mark.
And death threats seem to be the purview of the left. How many has the Kavanaugh family received, even before Ford came forward? The left truly believes that if facts and data don’t support their belief system, then thuggery will.
Of course, the WaPo didn’t look into the obvious – why her therapist didn’t follow through with the mandated reporting that s/he is required to do when a client advises of a crime committed. This law was put into place specifically to help victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, who may be reluctant to press charges against their accuser. The state of Maryland has no statute of limitations on sexual assault charges, so there would have been a police report if there had been any validity to the story to begin with. And had there been, the six investigations of Kavanaugh’s background by the FBI might have run across the information.
So, here are the facts. We have a confirmed alcoholic who was quite sexually active in high school going to a therapist, presumably due to marital problems as her husband was also involved in the therapy. She alleges that she was nearly raped – but can’t recall any details. No report of this alleged assault was made by the therapist, who is required to do so in order to keep his / her license. Then, she suddenly remembers the names of people who were at the party – four years after her initial report. None of those individuals remember anything of the sort.
No thinking person would look at this woman as a reliable or reputable witness to anything!