Peter Hasson on August 26, 2019
Former President Barack Obama’s possible new mansion on Martha’s Vineyard could be totally underwater by the year 2100, according to a climate change model relying on government data.
The Obamas are reportedly in the process of buying the island property, which was originally listed at listed at $14,850,000, from Boston Celtics owner Wyc Grousbeck. Though the deal has yet to be finalized, both TMZ and the Boston Herald have reported that the Obamas are in escrow.
Climate Central, a research group funded by the government during the Obama administration, projects the Obamas’ possible new mansion to be well underwater in its “Extreme Scenario 2100” model.
Obama’s possible new Martha’s Vineyard mansion could be underwater by 2100 (Screenshot/Google Earth/Digital Globe using Climate Central data)
Climate Central allows users to map the group’s model over Google Earth to see what flooding in specific areas could look like by the year 2100.
The Daily Caller News Foundation plugged the street address of the Obamas’ possible new mansion into the model, which projects the waterline to have advanced well past the property’s house and private beach footpath by 2100.
Climate Central’s model is based off of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) “extreme rise” scenario, which Climate Central described as “unlikely but increasingly plausible” in an April 2017 report.
Climate Central’s less pessimistic models still paint bleak pictures for the future of Obama’s potential new property.
The research group’s “Unchecked pollution” model shows the waterline approaching where the house would be on the map. Even the “Sharp carbon cuts” model shows the waterline surpassing the private beach, encroaching into the tree line.
The National Science Foundation (NSF), a federal agency, provided grants to Climate Central in 2009 and 2014, prompting criticism from Republican lawmakers at the time.
The New York Times has repeatedly leaned on Climate Central’s data in reporting on the environment.
The NYT cited Climate Center data in a compilation of graphs meant to be used as teaching resources in schools, published in February.
“In many coastal states, flood-prone areas have seen the highest rates of home construction since 2010, a study found, suggesting that the risks of climate change have yet to fundamentally change people’s behavior,” read a July NYT article, citing Climate Central.
“Washington, D.C., for example, may well be a flood zone by 2100,” the NYT reported in September 2014, linking to Climate Central’s data.
Neither Obama’s personal office nor Climate Central returned emails seeking comment for this article.
A Fox News panel saw participants marveling over the "enormous" popularity of Donald Trump as…
By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square) In a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on oversight of…
Emotionally unstable. Hormonally temperamental. Incapable of communicating and reduced to arguing like a pre-teen. These…
For a little over a hundred years, the United States and its dearest friends across…
Josselyn Berry, a top aide for Democrat Governor of Arizona, Katie Hobbs, has resigned following…
By Dr. Derek Ellerman Oh, dear reader, how many times now? How many times have…
View Comments
The climate change program has been a money making scheme by government democrats for the last 30 years. Business as usual. Nothing to see here., move along!
Well, we all survived the "global warming crisis" and now it's the "climate change's" turn. The fact is, the world is cyclonic, and these changing weather patterns are nothing new to the world. Throughout history, severe weather changes have been reported. Once fertile lands suffered droughts, flooding, increasing and decreasing average highs and lows. None of this is new, period.
Don't get me wrong, I firmly believe we can all be much kinder to our planet. I believe in recycling, re-using and restoring. We've become so busy in our lives that we forego doing the right thing for the sake of convenience and instant gratification.
Now to the topic of this article, I just cannot see Obama spending that amount of money on an estate that will be underwater.
Well, we all survived the "global warming crisis" and now it's the "climate change's" turn. The fact is, the world is cyclonic, and these changing weather patterns are nothing new to the world. Throughout history, severe weather changes have been reported. Once fertile lands suffered droughts, flooding, increasing and decreasing average highs and lows. None of this is new, period.
Don't get me wrong, I firmly believe we can all be much kinder to our planet. I believe in recycling, re-using and restoring. We've become so busy in our lives that we forego doing the right thing for the sake of convenience and instant gratification.
Now to the topic of this article, I just cannot see Obama spending that amount of money on an estate that will be underwater.
Oh, yes, that global warming scam. See -
aim.org/aim-colum http://www.n/why-the-russians-conceived-the-global-warming-scam/
https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2012/05/11/do-wind-turbines-harm-animals/ Who is really the culprits?
https://www.wind-watch.org/news/2012/05/11/do-wind-turbines-harm-animals/ Who is really the culprits?
HOPE HE'S IN IT WHEN IT GOES UNDER
HOPE HE'S IN IT WHEN IT GOES UNDER
we can only hope that it will happen, when they are on it.
But he will not be in it in 2100 !