On Monday, the Supreme Court announced it will hear two separate challenges to the use of Affirmative Action in college admissions – including in the Ivy Leagues.
The case could potentially have far-reaching effects on race-based policies.
Also making any possible rulings interesting is that the cases involve different categories of schools. One of the challenges involves Harvard, a private institution, the other, the University of North Carolina which is a state school.
BREAKING: Supreme Court agrees to hear challenge to affirmative action at Harvard, UNC https://t.co/fvqhy727F5
— Axios (@axios) January 24, 2022
The Nature Of The Complaints
The challenges specifically focus on the admissions processes of Harvard and UNC being discriminatory against prospective Asian-American students.
The lawsuits also argue that the admissions policies of both schools amount to “racial balancing” and thus discriminate against Asian-Americans, who may have higher scores and yet be rejected.
Lower courts have in the past sided with both Harvard and UNC, saying that race is only one of many factors in the admissions process and “is a necessary part of fostering student-body diversity.”
Support Conservative Voices!
Sign up to receive the latest political news, insight, and commentary delivered directly to your inbox.
Both schools have denied any intended discrimination in their admissions processes.
Harvard already gamed out the post Affirmative Action future by doing away with SAT requirement. Can't prove they're discriminating against Asians w better test scores when they don't even require test scores anymore…🤔😬🙃😀
— przidnt🥭 (@przidnt1) January 25, 2022
Not Anything New
Discrimination – intended or not – of Asian-American students is not new and has been studied for a while. A group called Asian American Coalition for Education has followed such studies for years.
As far back as 2007, author Daniel Golden in his book, “The Prices of Admission: How America’s Ruling Class Buys Its Way Into Elite Colleges- and Who Gets Left Outside,” described a “triple standard” at Harvard, where the highest standards were for Asian-Americans.
Another study from 2009 showed that Asian-American students had to score 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and 450 points higher than black students but still had the lowest acceptance rate of any SAT score bracket.
In 2014, Richard Sander in his book, “Mismatch: How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It’s Intended To Help and Why Universities Won’t Admit It,” said that at Harvard, Yale, and Cornell, “No other racial or ethnic group is as underrepresented relative to its application numbers as are Asian- Americans.”
This is your reminder that current affirmative action policies at places like Harvard are clearly racist, and no different in respect to Asians sad their antisemitic policies were to Jews a century ago.
Progressives ignore that prejudice at their own risk.
— Pradheep J. Shanker (@Neoavatara) January 24, 2022
Defending Affirmative Action
The Biden administration, in an attempt to uphold affirmative action policies, encouraged the Supreme Court to reject the challenge to the Harvard admissions policy last month.
The administration argued that Students For Fair Admissions had not proven what it called “special justifications” to overturn any affirmative action policies, stating that race-based admissions policies, “correctly recognize that securing the educational benefits that flow from such diversity is a sufficiently compelling interest to justify race-conscious measures.”
The Supreme Court has twisted itself and the civil rights laws into knots to sanction affirmative action in college admissions. Banning the practice would straighten things out, writes @RameshPonnuru https://t.co/EYI7B6mmc8 via @bopinion
— Bloomberg (@business) January 25, 2022
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.comWith Biden You Get All Of The Drama Of Trump Without Any Of The Benefits