On Thursday, the Supreme Court upheld an Arizona election integrity law that requires votes cast a the wrong precinct to be tossed out and limits ballot harvesting.
At issue was whether or not the new law violated the Voting Rights Act.
The vote by the Justices in the case broke along ideological lines. Justice Samuel Alito delivered the majority opinion.
Part of the majority opinion read in part,
“Neither Arizona’s out-of-precinct rule nor its ballot-collection law violates §2 of the VRA. Arizona’s out-of-precinct rule enforces the requirement that voters who choose to vote in person on election day must do so in their assigned precincts. Having to identify one’s own polling place and then travel there to vote does not exceed the “usual burdens of voting.'”
RELATED: NYC Mayoral Candidate Sues For ‘Fair Election Process’ After City Botches 135,000 Extra Ballots
The two provisions examined by the high court pertain to voting locations and who is eligible to drop off votes.
The first provision states that any in-person ballots cast on election day that are cast in a precinct other than the voter’s designated precinct will be thrown out.
The second provision restricts a procedure called “ballot collection,” and requires that only family caregivers, mail carriers, and election officials can deliver someone else’s completed ballot to a polling place.
The Supreme Court ruling overturned the federal appeals court in San Francisco’s earlier decision that Arizona’s measures violated a section of the Voting Rights Act known as Section 2, and determined that black, Hispanic, and Native American voters were disproportionally affected.
RELATED: Donald Rumsfeld Dead At 88
In her dissent, Justice Elena Kagan wrote, “What is tragic here is that the Court has (yet again) rewritten — in order to weaken — a statute that stands as a monument to America’s greatness, and protects against its basest impulses. What is tragic is that the Court has damaged a statute designed to bring about ‘the end of discrimination in voting.’ I respectfully dissent.”
She was joined by Justice Stephen Breyer and Justice Sonia Sotomayor.
Election Law expert Rick Hasen wrote in a blog post that the Court’s decision “severely weakened” the Section 2 clause of the Voting Rights Act. He also said that this decision, along with some others over the course of several years have, “taken away all the major available tools for going after voting restrictions.”
President Joe Biden said he was “deeply disappointed” in the ruling.
RELATED: Trump Blasts Biden While Visiting Border – ‘More Dangerous Than It’s Ever Been
Justice Alito made fraud a point of argument in his decision. He stated the Voting Rights Act provides,
“vital protection against discriminatory voting rules, and no one suggests that discrimination in voting has been extirpated or that the threat has been eliminated … Section Two of the law does not deprive the States of their authority to establish non-discriminatory voting rules. One strong and entirely legitimate state interest is the prevention of fraud.”
Alito continued, “Fraud can affect the outcome of a close election, and fraudulent votes dilute the right of citizens to cast ballots that carry appropriate weight,” he added that fraud can “also undermine public confidence in the fairness of elections and the perceived legitimacy of the announced outcome.”
Democrat elections lawyer Marc Elias vowed that the fight against similar new laws around the country would go on despite the ruling.
But Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey took it one step further, once again calling on Congress to pass his court-packing legislation, expanding the court from nine to 13, in order, “to restore balance to our top court.”
Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #16 on Feedspot’s “Top 70 Conservative Political Blogs, Websites & Influencers in 2021.”
By J. Peder Zane for RealClearPolitics He’s woke. She’s woke. So are they, them, ey,…
MSNBC's Joy Reid took on the task of attempting to make left-wing billionaire George Soros…
Hillary Clinton was mocked on social media after a video skit was released by Columbia…
Conservative author Matt Palumbo, who is responsible for such titles as "The Man Behind the…
Due to a Kremlin anti-gay rule that could put Russian sportsmen at risk once they…
Representative Matt Gaetz reveals that he and Marjorie Taylor Greene have invited Tara Reade, a…
At least you're open about your racism...
You mean like Democrats did as members of the White League, KKK, Gun and sabre clubs and other organizations formed by insurrectionists representative of pro slavery pro apartheid? Democrats have always profited from racism in one form or another, don;t be fooled because they changed the colors of their hoods and sheets.
I am old enough to remember when all those segregationist Democrats turned Republican in the 1970's. Those members of KKK, those people waving Confederate flags, are all now Republicans. Republican Legislatures in States all over the country are passing laws making it harder for Black Americans to vote because the Republican Party is now the party of white supremacists.
Lying paid troll
You are just mad it makes it harder for you libtards to steal elections!
eingraff and his ilk are sucking off aliens in as fast as they can
Beating your drum again
Read up Bubba!
Join Ronnie and learn something
Were you born an asshole?