Daily Caller

Judge Reups Nationwide Injunction As Supreme Court Weighs Trump’s Asylum Restrictions

Kevin Daley on September 9, 2019

A federal judge in Oakland, California, restored a nationwide injunction against President Donald Trump’s new asylum restrictions Monday, while the Supreme Court considers whether the policy can take effect on an interim basis.

In effect, Trump’s proposed rule would deny asylum to any migrant who traveled through a third country on their way to the United States without first seeking protected status there. The administration believes that reform would relieve pressure on an overburdened immigration system.

“While nationwide injunctions are not the ‘general rule,’ they are appropriate ‘where such breadth is necessary to remedy a plaintiff’s harm,” U.S. District Judge Jon Tigar wrote in Monday’s order. “This is such a case.”

Tigar first entered a nationwide injunction against the third-country transit bar in July. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals narrowed the scope of that injunction in August, ruling it could only take effect within their jurisdiction. That meant the third-country requirement could be applied to asylum-seekers in Texas and New Mexico, but not Arizona and California.

The Trump administration then filed a stay application at the Supreme Court, asking the justices to let the rule take effect while litigation continues. A decision on that request, No. 19A230, Barr v. East Bay Sanctuary Covenant, could come at any time. As such, Tigar’s Monday injunction may ultimately prove short-lived.

The 9th Circuit also said in its August decision that Tigar could restore the nationwide injunction if he made additional factual findings to support such an order.

The judge did just that with Monday’s ruling. The plaintiffs are a coalition of migrants rights groups who provide support for immigrants and pro bono attorneys. Tigar said the plaintiffs are entitled to a nationwide injunction because their operations will become significantly more costly and complicated if the third-country transit bar applies in some parts of the country but not others.

“The organizations have presented sufficient evidence that they will suffer organizational and diversion of resources harms unless the rule is enjoined outside of, as well as within, the 9th Circuit,” Tigar wrote. “A nationwide injunction is thus ‘necessary to give prevailing parties the relief to which they are entitled.’”

The administration has argued that the plaintiffs do not having standing to bring their lawsuit. Tigar dismissed their position as a “straw man” in Monday’s decision.

The judge went on to explain that a nationwide injunction is necessary to ensure uniform enforcement of immigration policies and avoid “major administrability issues.”

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), which represents the plaintiffs coalition alongside the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), applauded Tigar’s decision while decrying Trump’s “war on asylum-seekers.”

“This ruling levels the playing field for all the vulnerable individuals and families seeking refuge in the United States,” said SPLC lawyer Melissa Crow. “With this decision, regardless of where they cross the border, these people should be able to seek asylum. Sadly, while this ruling removes a major hurdle, far too many obstacles remain, as this administration’s war on asylum-seekers appears to know no bounds.”

Daily Caller

DCwire features investigative reporting syndicated with permission from the Daily Caller News Foundation.

View Comments

  • Why in the world does everybody have rights to come into our country but the citizens have no rights to stop them. We have no power only the lawyers for all these groups that are not even citizens.

  • Why in the world does everybody have rights to come into our country but the citizens have no rights to stop them. We have no power only the lawyers for all these groups that are not even citizens.

  • As a citizen who lives in Az I am sick and tired of liberal Calif judges over stepping their authority and telling me and citizens across our country how to live. Its time to remove these activist judges who misuse their power and cause harm to our country!

  • Mexico offered asylum but with the stipulation that migrants earn their keep by working. Most migrants preferred traveling north to the US where they would be given free housing, healthcare and schooling for their children.

  • The statistics speak for themselves, 90% claiming asylum, have no legitimate claim. They don't even show up for their hearings, because it was a bogus claim in the 1st place. Activist of illegal immigration in my opinion don't have standing, and a National from another country don't have standing to demand entry, so they can file a false claim. I do hope the SC deals with this issue quickly, to stop the raping of Americans.

Recent Posts

AOC Loses it During House Oversight Hearing, Calls Hunter Biden’s Laptop ‘Half-Fake’

During a hearing for the Congressional Oversight Committee regarding censorship by Twitter during the 2020…

9 hours ago

Watchdogs Say Unemployment Fraud Likely Topped $191 Billion

By Brett Rowland (The Center Square) Slightly more than $1 out of every $5 distributed…

9 hours ago

Gov. Whitmer Proposes $79 Billion Budget For Fiscal Year 2024

By Scott McLallen (The Center Square) Gov. Gretchen Whitmer proposed a $79 billion budget for…

11 hours ago

Law Enforcement Pushes Back Against Democrats’ Claims About Fentanyl And Southern Border

By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square) Local and federal law enforcement officers are pushing back…

11 hours ago

Rep. Byron Donalds Slams Democrats Who Say Focusing on Border Security is a ‘White Nationalist Conspiracy’

Rep. Byron Donalds has had it with Democrats attempting to continue painting Republican efforts to…

12 hours ago

Congress Spends $3.6M on Michelle Obama Trail in GA

By Adam Andrzejewski for RealClearWire As part of the $1.7 trillion omnibus spending bill passed…

13 hours ago