Democrat Operative Claims He Was Involved In Massive Mail-In Voting Fraud For Decades

democrat mail-in voting fraud

An anonymous Democrat operative has told the New York Post of how he was involved in massive mail-in voting fraud, going back decades.

The Democrat operative, whose identity and involvement in the elections was verified by the New York Post, claimed that mail-in voting fraud is “the rule rather than the exception.”

Democrat Operative Led Voter Fraud Teams In Multiple States

He not only changed ballots himself, but also “led teams of fraudsters” in New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania. “An election that is swayed by 500 votes, 1,000 votes — it can make a difference,” he said. “It could be enough to flip states.”

“There is no race in New Jersey – from city council to United States Senate – that we haven’t worked on,” he continued, with the Garden State being his base of operations.

“I worked on a fire commissioner’s race in Burlington County. The smaller the race, the easier it is to do.” The NY Post confirmed this, noting a number of huge names he has worked with.

Working With Corrupt Postal Workers

The insider told the NY Post about a number of methods that he and others have used to gain an advantage for the Democrats. His team would offer to take the mail-in voting ballots from voters as a public service, unseal the envelope by holding it over steam, and then switching out the real ballots for fake ones.

“Five minutes per ballot tops,” he said.

These would then be spread out in many different mailboxes to not arouse suspicion. Of course, this is a little easier when you just bribe the postal workers.

“You have a postman who is a rabid anti-Trump guy and he’s working in Bedminster or some Republican stronghold,” he said. “He can take those [filled-out] ballots, and knowing 95% are going to a Republican, he can just throw those in the garbage.”

RELATED: Judge Orders New Election In New Jersey After Mail-In Voting Caused Last Election To Be Riddled With Fraud

Harvesting Votes From The Elderly, And Impersonation At The Voting Booth

The technique known in the UK as “granny-farming” was also widely used – the operative and his team would “help” the elderly in care homes fill out their ballots, always making sure they instead went Democrat.

Another place to go to hoover up votes was homeless shelters, which are a “nearly inexhaustible pool” of voters who would be very willing to change their ballot for money.

If all else failed, they would simply just go and impersonate voters in person, especially in states that do not require voter ID. The list of registered voters who hadn’t turned out would be checked, and the team would pick one to impersonate.

They would go into the polling station and match the signature that was on the record – if the person had already voted, it would simply be an “innocent mistake.”

Ballots Are Bent To Know The Fix Has Been Done

When it came time to discuss any potential irregularities at the count, the fraudster would know which mail-in ballots would not need to be thrown out, as any fraudulent ones would be marked with a bend in the corner.

“It doesn’t stay bent, but you can tell it’s been bent, the tipster said. “Until the [certificate] is approved, the ballot doesn’t matter. They don’t get to see the ballot unless they approve the [certificate.]”

These fraudulent ballots were then mixed in with the real ones. At that point, it’s impossible to distinguish which are real and which are fake. “Once a ballot is opened, it’s an anonymous ballot.”

RELATED: Judge Rules Against 50,000 Requests For Absentee Ballots In Iowa

Truly Shocking Revelations

Now of course, this man could simply be lying for attention, or to see how much they could get the media to fall for this. But all of this is “perfectly possible,” said Hans von Spakovsky, a fellow at the Heritage Foundation who specializes in voter fraud. “There is nothing new about these techniques,” he added.

The question is, now we know just how deeply embedded into the Democrat machine this fraud is, can we truly trust the results in November?

Mentioned in this article::