Congress Can’t Regulate Voting In Presidential Elections

By Steven Gow Calabresi for RealClearPolitics

There has been heated debate in Congress over H.R. 1, a House bill that overrides state election laws by mandating a number of bad ideas including an automatic right to mail-in voting; the ability to drop ballots off at unwatched ballot boxes; and curtailing the ability of members of both parties to watch the counting of votes.

I oppose this bill because 1) if you need to show a government ID or driver’s license to fly on an airplane, you should need to show one to vote; 2) it gets rid of the secret ballot by encouraging campaign workers to knock on people’s doors, get them to vote with the campaign worker looking on — and with the campaign worker then offering to turn the ballot in; and 3) representatives of both parties ought to be able to watch votes being tallied. I support absentee ballots, but only when a voter gives a reason for needing one.

RELATED: Polls: Biden And Congress Hit New Lows Among Voters

We chose to deviate from some of these principles in the 2020 national elections because of the COVID-19 epidemic. Now that that epidemic is largely under control, we should return to secret ballots cast at the polls, by voters with a government ID, or by absentee ballot requested in advance (for a good reason) and accompanied by a government ID.

Democracy depends on the elimination of voting fraud, which is why H.R. 1 is dangerous and undemocratic legislation.

But, even if this measure were to be mistakenly passed into law, it would apply only to eligibility to vote in congressional elections — not eligibility to vote in presidential or state elections. Congress has no power to regulate those elections.

Congressional power to regulate congressional elections comes from Article I, Section 4, of the Constitution, which says: “The Times, Places, and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be proscribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of chusing Senators.”

There is nothing in this clause that allows Congress to regulate the selection of presidential electors or of state officers. Any federal law that purports to regulate presidential or state elections would be unconstitutional and, therefore, null and void.

Article II, Section 1, says that: “Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors” who together form the Electoral College, which elects the president. For years, many state legislatures themselves picked their state’s presidential electors, but a sound and worthy tradition has grown up since at least 1830 of states awarding all of their electoral votes to the winner of each state’s popular presidential election, with the voting rules for that election specified in advance by the state legislature.

RELATED: The Danger Of The McAuliffe-Abrams Stolen Election Claims

Congress may be able under the Necessary and Proper Clause to require that state legislatures set the rules for selecting their presidential electors in advance of the election. Congress may also, as the Electoral Count Act purports to do, set dates for the casting of electoral votes in the states, and for the counting of those electoral votes by Congress.

But, Congress has no power to tell a state who is eligible to vote in a presidential or state election. (There are many scholars who think the Electoral Count Act is unconstitutional.)

Congress also cannot prevent the states from returning to the situation at the nation’s founding where some state presidential electors are picked by state legislatures. And Congress cannot tell Maine and Nebraska to pick their presidential electors at large, nor could Congress tell state legislatures that they have to award an electoral vote to the winner of each state’s congressional district.

To my mind, it would be a very bad idea for state legislatures to pick presidential electors rather than holding a popular vote for president, but it would not be unconstitutional.

What would be clearly unconstitutional, however, is for Congress to set national voting rules as to who is eligible to vote in presidential or state elections. The Constitution leaves that power exclusively to the states.

Steven Gow Calabresi is the Clayton J. and Henry R. Barber Professor at Northwestern University’s Pritzker School of Law.

Syndicated with permission from RealClearWire.


Recent Posts

DeSantis Making His Move? He’s On The Campaign Trail Supporting MAGA Candidates In Battleground States

While all eyes are focused on the 2022 midterm elections, there are some looking forward…

7 hours ago

General Mark Milley Reportedly Vowed To ‘Fight’ Trump From The Inside, ‘If They Want to Put Me in Prison, Have At It’

General Mark Milley reportedly vowed to fight then-President Donald Trump in 2020 "from the inside"…

8 hours ago

Democrats’ Inflation Reduction Act Is Going To Unleash An Army Of 80,000 New IRS Agents

The Inflation Reduction Act, erroneously named and passed by Senate Democrats on a strictly partisan…

9 hours ago

N.C. School District Goes Proactive, Plans To Put AR-15’s In Every School

Since the horrific school shooting in May in Uvalde, Texas, law enforcement and school officials…

10 hours ago

Pentagon Rejects National Guard Request From DC Mayor To Help Deal With Influx Of Illegal Immigrants

The Pentagon has denied a request for National Guard aid from Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel…

12 hours ago

Don’t Be Fooled—The Left Is Gaslighting On The Economy

By Dr. Robert McClure for RealClearFlorida “The last thing you want to do is to…

12 hours ago