AOC Claims ‘Zero Evidence’ To Impeach Biden: Here’s The Evidence
It is, as Elon Musk says, as if AOC is just not that smart.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the socialist Representative from New York, had herself a day at the Biden impeachment inquiry hearings yesterday.
First, she questioned each of the three Republican witnesses as to whether they had “first-hand witness” testimony showing evidence of impeachable offenses by the President.
And, of course, barring their actually being on hand when Biden is handed a bag of money with a giant dollar sign on the front of it, then no, the testimony or evidence won’t be firsthand. We’re skeptical of the idea that Ocasio-Cortez even knows what firsthand means.
Then she took to the X social media platform to claim Republicans presented “zero evidence to impeach President Biden.”
Republicans have zero evidence to impeach President Biden. pic.twitter.com/GcA92T7JSl
— Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@RepAOC) September 28, 2023
No Evidence To Impeach Biden? Come On, Man!
Now, you just know Ocasio-Cortez thinks that her “grilling” of witnesses and her bold statement that there is no evidence to impeach President Biden are, in her mind, walk-off statements.
And who could blame her? The media will dutifully go to bat for her. And for Biden, for that matter.
Remember the wall-to-wall coverage of President Donald Trump’s impeachment proceedings? Gone.
The fact-checkers who scrutinized every statement in his defense? Now defending Biden every step of the way.
There is no independent press holding government accountable in this country any longer.
— National Review (@NRO) September 20, 2023
But we don’t play that game here at The Political Insider. Why? Because, unlike the legacy media, we are not the enemy of truth or the enemy of the people.
With that, there is a plethora of evidence supporting an inquiry to impeach Biden. And there is some solid evidence that he was a significant beneficiary of Hunter Biden’s business schemes, making him beholden to numerous foreign entities.
In fact, the word “beneficiary” is an important one.
Just days prior to Ocasio-Cortez claiming that there is “zero evidence” to impeach Biden, a report came out showing the President’s home address in Delaware was listed as a “beneficiary” of wires totaling more than $250,000 from Hunter Biden’s Chinese business partners in 2019.
While Biden was running for president, his son received $260,000 from China, with Joe’s Delaware home as the beneficiary address on the money wires. Bank records don’t lie—unlike Joe Biden.
— Kevin McCarthy (@SpeakerMcCarthy) September 28, 2023
In fact, those payments came just months after Biden announced his presidential campaign. Almost as if they were trying to curry favor with the Biden brand somehow in anticipation of his election. Huh.
Now, if you are the most ardent schill for the President (like CNN’s fact-checker
Paul Reubens Daniel Dale) you might come back and say, “No, those are just payments to Hunter and while we were originally reticent to admit the President’s son is a greasy money whore for other nations, we can accept that fact now in order to defend our muse in the White House.”
You might say that. Just one problem.
Hunter was not living with his parents in Delaware at the time of the payments, he was living in California. We know this because of Hunter’s rejected sweetheart plea deal.
White House spox is straight up lying. Hunter wasn’t staying at his parents’ house, he was living in California when the Chinese business associates sent their payments with Joe Biden’s address on them, according to Hunter’s failed guilty plea @DailyCaller https://t.co/wneWjoWx6z https://t.co/2OtBC701bW pic.twitter.com/cLymw9ELsq
— James Lynch (@jameslynch32) September 27, 2023
The Beneficiary, The Brand, And The Big Guy
Aside from being a “beneficiary” of payments from China, there is plenty of other evidence to justify the effort to impeach President Biden.
According to reported photographs, visitor logs, and other documentation, President Biden personally met with at least 14 of Hunter’s business associates over 16 occasions between 2010 and 2018 – including associates from China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine, and Mexico.
Why? As part of an effort, according to Hunter Biden business associate Devon Archer, to sell their name.
Archer testified that the President personally interjected nearly two dozen times on phone calls and in personal meetings with his son’s business associates while serving as vice president as a means to sell “the brand.”
? BREAKING: Hunter Biden’s former business partner Devon Archer testified that VP Joe Biden was put on speakerphone 20+ times to “sell the brand” in business discussions pic.twitter.com/uwtgXcJPfZ
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) July 31, 2023
An IRS whistleblower’s testimony earlier this year revealed a WhatsApp message from Hunter threatening a foreign national and claiming that his father was sitting in the room with him at the time as a means to strong-arm him.
“I am sitting here with my father and we would like to understand why the commitment made has not been fulfilled,” Hunter told a Chinese businessman before issuing an explicit threat.
Their warnings fell on deaf ears.
In August 2020, a search warrant uncovered a text between Hunter and Henry Zhao, an executive at a Chinese company that paid Hunter $100,000.
The text mentioned Joe Biden repeatedly.
Investigators were not allowed to verify the information. pic.twitter.com/wpqmrkppz1
— Rep. Jason Smith (@RepJasonSmith) June 22, 2023
Archer also confirmed that the then-Vice President Biden met in 2014 with Russian billionaire Elena Baturina — the widow of the former mayor of Moscow — at a Georgetown café.
Coincidentally, Baturina was left off Biden’s Russia sanctions last year, which would seemingly be a clear-cut example of the President being compromised to the detriment of national security!
Devon Archer just testified that Joe Biden met with the Moscow mayor’s billionaire wife Elena Baturina in spring 2014 before she wired $3.5 million to Hunter Biden.
Baturina is the same Russian oligarch the Biden regime refused to sanction.
If you are looking for how the Biden… pic.twitter.com/QNGZkIKsLK
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) July 31, 2023
Democrats and the media want you to believe Biden never got a piece of that pie.
Biden has already admitted to using his position to pressure Ukraine to fire the country’s prosecutor for looking into a gas company connected with his son, Hunter.
It’s all on tape.
JOE BIDEN: “I would not dictate who should be prosecuted or who should be exonerated.”
ALSO JOE BIDEN: “I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money. Well, son of a bitch. He got fired.”
What a scumbag. pic.twitter.com/GsQPCX5FyJ
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) November 21, 2019
That prosecutor, by the way, was Viktor Shokin, who very recently accused Hunter and President Biden himself of accepting bribes.
If you are to believe Ocasio-Cortez, then you also have to ignore the shell bank accounts with at least $20 million from foreign sources to the Biden family.
Here is all the “no evidence” in the Biden impeachment inquiry obtained by House Oversight.
1. Hunter’s business partners & associates met in the White House over 80 times when Biden was VP pic.twitter.com/RtUgRtgfgl
— Kyle Becker (@kylenabecker) September 13, 2023
Hell, we can go all the way back to one of the initial pieces of evidence from Hunter’s laptop that the media tried desperately to censor.
A 2017 email obtained by Fox News just prior to the 2020 presidential election appeared to outline a payout for the President in a joint venture with CEFC China Energy.
It included a proposed equity split of “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?”
Tony Bobulinski, a former business associate of Hunter Biden, has insisted the “big guy” is a reference to Joe Biden, though that has not been confirmed elsewhere.
— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) October 28, 2020
Biden’s the “brand.” He’s the “beneficiary.” And he’s the “big guy.”
But we’re supposed to believe there is “zero evidence” to impeach?
The only thing in short supply, the only thing that there is “zero” of, is integrity amongst Ocasio-Cortez, her Democrat colleagues, and the media.
Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”