5 Times The Media Showed Their True Liberal Colors In 2015

2015

As readers of The Political Insider know, the biggest ally to the Democrat Party has been the media.

The mainstream media have helped to keep liberals in power, have helped to ruin true conservative politicians with their blatant lies, have shaped public opinion, and have simply rewritten the past to make one of the worst presidents in our nation’s history seem like an infallible king.

2015 of course, has been no different.

With that in mind, and as we close in on 2016, let’s take a look back at some of the more egregious, vomit-inducing, boot licking examples of liberal media bias from the past year.

NBC Correspondent Ayman Mohyeldin – Chris Kyle is a racist who went on an Iraqi killing spree.

“When you juxtapose it [the movieAmerican Sniper] with the real Chris Kyle and what has emerged about what kind of personality he was…. a lot of his own personal opinions about what he was doing in Iraq, how he viewed Iraqis. Some of what people have described as his racist tendencies towards Iraqis and Muslims as he was going on some of these, you know, killing sprees in Iraq on assignment.”

Rachel Maddow – Iran deal will be the “greatest foreign policy achievement … of this American generation.”

People “will look back at this presidency, they’ll look back at this president, and they’ll say, of course they gave him the Nobel Peace Prize, of course they did.”

Dick Meyer, Scripps Howard Bureau Chief – Obama is the greatest thing to happen to America, and the peasants best recognize.

“Americans are lucky to have Barack Obama as president and we should wake up and appreciate it while we can.

President Obama will go down in history as an extraordinary president, probably a great one.

… it would be a morale booster and a sign of civic maturity if more Americans appreciated what an exceptional president they have right now.”

Allow me to …

Sally Kohn – Donald Trump wants to make the White House really, really white again.

“Part of what he is speaking to is a part of the American public that for the past seven years has felt outraged. They talk about taking the White House back. They’ve talked about, he retweeted, they want the ‘WHITE’ House back. Capital W-H-I-T-E.”

Reporters Chasing After Hillary’s Scooby Van – The Business Insider reported on this embarrassing scene.

“Presidential candidate and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton caused a journalistic stampede when she arrived for her first public campaign event at a school in Iowa.

The van Clinton is using for her campaign road trip apparently pulled up to a back entrance of the Kirkwood Community College campus. This left a pack of reporters scrambling to see her enter the building.”

Reporters falling all over themselves to chase after their chosen one for President. Check it out …

Comment: What other examples of media bias do you remember from this past year? Tell us below.

29 thoughts on “5 Times The Media Showed Their True Liberal Colors In 2015”

  1. Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew Sex scandal (part 2)
    March 2005 – Florida police investigate Jeffrey Epstein for “sexual battery” following accusations that he paid female minors for sex during 2004 and 2005.

    May 2006 – A probable cause affidavit is filed against Epstein by Palm Beach police, accusing him of four counts of unlawful sex with minors and one count of molestation. A grand jury returns with a single charge of solicitation of prostitution.

    August 2006 – Epstein pleads not guilty to the charge of solicitation of prostitution.

    September 2007 – Famed criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz helped Epstein negotiate a then-secret non-prosecution agreement with the US Attorney’s Office, which deferred to the Palm Beach County State Attorney’s Office for criminal charges.

    February 2008 – A $US50 million civil lawsuit is filed against Epstein by an anonymous Virginia woman, stating that in 2004-2005 as a 16-year-old minor she was “recruited to give Epstein a massage” and forced to have sex with him.

    March 2008 – A second similar civil action is filed against Epstein, though this and other accusations against Epstein will eventually be settled out of court.

    June 2008 – Epstein pleads guilty to solicitation of prostitution, avoiding a trial involving more serious charges. Epstein begins an 18-month sentence in prison, of which he will serve 13 months.

    July 2008 – Two lawyers, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, filed a Jane Doe lawsuit against the US government, alleging Epstein committed crimes against their clients, including sex trafficking of children by fraud.

    July 2008 – The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rules the prosecutors in the case against Epstein failed to ensure that his victims were informed of the plea deal before it was agreed, a violation of the Crime Victims Rights Act.

    22 July 2009 – Epstein is released from prison.

    February 2011 – Prince Andrew is photographed walking in Central Park in New York with Epstein. Media reports indicate Andrew spent four days at Epstein’s home in New York.

    March 2011 – Virginia Roberts, an American woman, speaking to UK newspaper The Daily Mail, claims to have been forced to serve as Epstein’s “sex slave” and accuses him of forcing her to have sex with some of his famous and powerful friends. Though former US President Bill CLINTON associated with Epstein, Ms Roberts claims she never had sex with him, nor did she think he had sex with anyone associated with Epstein.

    Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal part 3
    March 2011 – It is revealed that Epstein gave Prince Andrew’s ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, £15,000 to reduce her debts.

    July 2011 – Prince Andrew resigns as UK trade envoy amid ferocious criticism over his friendship with Epstein.

    30 December 2014 – A court filing in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, filed as part of the civil case against Epstein pending since July 2008, alleges Epstein forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with several men, including Prince Andrew and Alan M. Dershowitz, a famous Harvard Law professor and criminal defence attorney. Epstein made Roberts available to powerful men to ingratiate himself with them and to obtain potential blackmail information, according to the filing.

    January 2015 – Speaking to the Daily Mail, Virginia Roberts says Epstein paid her £10,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew while she was still a minor.

    January 2015 – Buckingham Palace releases this statement: “It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. The allegations made are false and without any foundation.”

    – Sydney Morning Herald

  2. Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal
    NICK O’MALLEY Last updated 14:50, January 6 2015 Reuters
    Former US president Bill Clinton has been drawn into the scandal surrounding Virginia Roberts’ allegations she was instructed to have sex with Prince Andrew by American financier Jeffrey Epstein.

    Court documents show Clinton was one of many high-profile friends of Epstein to visit his private island and fly on his jet, and that Epstein’s phone directory showed he had 21 phone numbers for Clinton or his aides.

    The documents suggest no wrong-doing on Clinton’s behalf, but they have set off speculation – particularly on the part of conservative online media – about the potential impact of the scandal on Hillary Clinton’s presumed run for the White House.”Bubba and the Palm Beach Pedophile” screams a headline on the Drudge Report, the conservative blog made famous by its Monica Lewinsky scandal revelations, in a headline today.

    Gregory P. Mango
    Wall Street financier Jeffrey Epstein was convicted in 2008 of soliciting an underage girl for prostitution.

    “The [flight logs] clearly show that Clinton frequently flew with Epstein aboard his plane, then suddenly stopped – raising the suspicion that the friendship abruptly ended, perhaps because of events related to Epstein’s sexual abuse of children,” says a statement of facts lodged by Roberts’ lawyer in a civil case.

    “This information certainly leads one to believe that Clinton might well be a source of relevant information and efforts to obtain discovery from him were reasonably calculated to lead to admissible evidence,” it went on.

    In an interview with the Daily Mail in 2011, Roberts, who was 17 when she met Epstein and claims she became his “sex slave”, describes meeting Clinton while with Epstein, but says she was never “lent out” to him, as she says she was to Prince Andrew.

    Attorney and law professor Alan Dershowitz denies assaulting Virginia Roberts. He also denies ever meeting her.

    The statement of facts lodged last week by Roberts’ lawyers alleges that Epstein’s goal in trafficking minors to rich and powerful people was to “ingratiate himself with them for business, personal, political, and financial gain, as well as to obtain potential blackmail information”.

    It is alleged Epstein has photographs of young women engaged in sex acts.

    Other court documents – filed in 2011 as part of a related civil dispute – suggest CLINTON was one of several high-profile people to have become friends with Epstein.

    Buckingham Palace steps up its denial that Prince Andrew had sex with an underage girl and names the victim which the U.K. press say had wanted to remain anonymous. Mana Rabiee reports.

    Donald Trump, the Republican developer and TV personality who is considering his own run for the White House in 2016 features in these.

    “The message pads confiscated from Epstein’s home indicated that Trump called Epstein’s West Palm Beach mansion on several occasions during the time period most relevant to my client’s complaints,” say the documents.

    “Trump was quoted in a Vanity Fair article about Epstein as saying ‘I’ve known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it – Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”‘

    The documents allege that Ghislaine Maxwell, the socialite daughter of the late press magnate Robert Maxwell, introduced the then 15-year-old Roberts to Epstein, and forced her to have sex with them and other powerful associates. Maxell denies the allegations.

    The high-profile former Harvard law professor, defence attorney and political commentator Alan Dershowitz, on Monday furiously denied allegations in the new documents that he not only assaulted Roberts, but that he witnessed assaults of her and other young women by Epstein and several co-conspirators.

    On NBC’s Today Show on Monday morning Dershowitz denied ever having met Roberts.

    “I don’t even know who she is,” he said. “I’ve never seen her, I’ve never met her. Her lawyers have to know this. Her lawyers . . . deliberately and wilfully filed this in a pleading, which they knew I had no opportunity to respond to in court, without any investigation.

    “If they had simply investigated the manifest of the airplanes, if they had checked my travel records, if they had asked me, and I could have given them the names of the people who are witnesses, they would know the story is totally false”.

    Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal Part 2
    The explosive new allegations of abuse of Virginia Roberts by Prince Andrew begins with another broader, older, scandal – that the billionaire American financier Jeffrey Epstein procured young women and girls to have sex with and to “loan” to his powerful friends.

    It is alleged Epstein hoped to ingratiate himself with them, and even to gather potential blackmail material.

    In 2008 Epstein pleaded guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution and served 13 months of an 18-month sentence after prosecutors in Florida dropped other charges in a plea deal.

    The scandal has resurfaced over the past days because when he pleaded guilty to a single charge as part of a deal with prosecutors that gave him immunity from prosecution over more serious federal charges, the prosecutors failed to inform his victims of the deal, in violation of the law.

    Two of those victims have been fighting for more than six years to have that immunity rescinded as a result.

    Those victims are known as Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2.

    Last week Jane Doe 3 – who has revealed herself to be Roberts – and Jane Doe 4 filed a motion to join that lawsuit.

    It is in these court documents that new details about allegations against Prince Andrew and Epstein have been revealed.

    Roberts alleges she was abused by Epstein – and at times by his friends including Prince Andrew – between 1999 and 2002, when she married an Australian in Thailand and moved to the New South Wales Central Coast.

    She returned to the US in 2013.

    TIMELINE

    1998 – Virginia Roberts meets Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of a disgraced British newspaper tycoon and close associate of Jeffrey Epstein.

    1999-2002 – The time period during which Virginia Roberts [Jane Doe #3] claims to have spent as a “sex slave” for Jeffrey Epstein, servicing him and numerous powerful men associated with Epstein.

    2000 – Jeffrey Epstein is a guest at a party at Windsor Castle celebrating the birthday of Queen Elizabeth II.

    2002 – Virginia Roberts leaves Epstein and marries a man in Thailand.

    March 2005 – Florida police investigate Jeffrey Epstein for “sexual battery” following accusations that he paid female minors for sex during 2004 and 2005.

    May 2006 – A probable cause affidavit is filed against Epstein by Palm Beach police, accusing him of four counts of unlawful sex with minors and one count of molestation. A grand jury returns with a single charge of solicitation of prostitution.

    August 2006 – Epstein pleads not guilty to the charge of solicitation of prostitution.

    September 2007 – Famed criminal defense attorney Alan Dershowitz helped Epstein negotiate a then-secret non-prosecution agreement with the US Attorney’s Office, which deferred to the Palm Beach County State Attorney’s Office for criminal charges.

    February 2008 – A $US50 million civil lawsuit is filed against Epstein by an anonymous Virginia woman, stating that in 2004-2005 as a 16-year-old minor she was “recruited to give Epstein a massage” and forced to have sex with him.

    March 2008 – A second similar civil action is filed against Epstein, though this and other accusations against Epstein will eventually be settled out of court.

    June 2008 – Epstein pleads guilty to solicitation of prostitution, avoiding a trial involving more serious charges. Epstein begins an 18-month sentence in prison, of which he will serve 13 months.

    July 2008 – Two lawyers, Brad Edwards and Paul Cassell, filed a Jane Doe lawsuit against the US government, alleging Epstein committed crimes against their clients, including sex trafficking of children by fraud.

    July 2008 – The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rules the prosecutors in the case against Epstein failed to ensure that his victims were informed of the plea deal before it was agreed, a violation of the Crime Victims Rights Act.

    22 July 2009 – Epstein is released from prison.

    February 2011 – Prince Andrew is photographed walking in Central Park in New York with Epstein. Media reports indicate Andrew spent four days at Epstein’s home in New York.

    March 2011 – Virginia Roberts, an American woman, speaking to UK newspaper The Daily Mail, claims to have been forced to serve as Epstein’s “sex slave” and accuses him of forcing her to have sex with some of his famous and powerful friends. Though former US President Bill CLINTON associated with Epstein, Ms Roberts claims she never had sex with him, nor did she think he had sex with anyone associated with Epstein.

    Bill Clinton drawn into Prince Andrew sex scandal part 3
    March 2011 – It is revealed that Epstein gave Prince Andrew’s ex-wife, Sarah Ferguson, £15,000 to reduce her debts.

    July 2011 – Prince Andrew resigns as UK trade envoy amid ferocious criticism over his friendship with Epstein.

    30 December 2014 – A court filing in the United States District Court in the Southern District of Florida, filed as part of the civil case against Epstein pending since July 2008, alleges Epstein forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with several men, including Prince Andrew and Alan M. Dershowitz, a famous Harvard Law professor and criminal defence attorney. Epstein made Roberts available to powerful men to ingratiate himself with them and to obtain potential blackmail information, according to the filing.

    January 2015 – Speaking to the Daily Mail, Virginia Roberts says Epstein paid her £10,000 to have sex with Prince Andrew while she was still a minor.

    January 2015 – Buckingham Palace releases this statement: “It is emphatically denied that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts. The allegations made are false and without any foundation.”

    – Sydney Morning Herald

  3. HILLARY CLINTON AND THE RELEASE OF THOUSANDS OF CRIMINAL ALIENS
    Here’s an underreported scandal brought to my attention by Bill Otis. CBS News reports:

    The U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) released 36,007 convicted criminal aliens last year who were awaiting the outcome of deportation proceedings, according to a report issued Monday by the Center for Immigration Studies.

    The group of released criminals includes those convicted of homicide, sexual assault, kidnapping and aggravated assault, according to the report, which cites a document prepared by the ICE. . . .

    According to the report, the 36,007 individuals released represented nearly 88,000 convictions, including:

    •193 homicide convictions
    •426 sexual assault convictions
    •303 kidnapping convictions
    •1,075 aggravated assault convictions
    •1,160 stolen vehicle convictions
    •9,187 dangerous drug convictions
    •16,070 drunk or drugged driving convictions

    In effect, the administration has, as Bill Otis puts it, “unleashed its own crime wave.” But who within the administration was responsible for this for wanton indifference to public safety?

    One responsible party is Hillary Clinton. Mark Krikorian of the Center for Immigration Studies explains why:

    The Supreme Court [has] held that the federal government can detain aliens for deportation up to six months but generally must release the alien into the United States after that point if there is “no significant likelihood of removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.” One of the main reasons such a situation arises is that a criminal alien’s home country will refuse to take its nationals back.

    Why would a criminal alien’s home country take the criminal back? Because federal law requires the secretary of state to stop issuing visas to the citizens of any country that refuses to take back its nationals.

    Refusing to issue visas to citizens of a foreign country would provide a powerful incentive for that country to take back its nationals and thus create a significant likelihood of removal in the foreseeable future. This, in turn, would enable the U.S. to avoid releasing criminal aliens onto our streets.

    But according to Krikorian, Hillary Clinton and John Kerry have ignored the law and continued issuing visas to citizens of countries that refuse to take back their citizens. Apparently, they don’t wish to risk alienating these countries. They would rather see dangerous criminals on the loose in the United States.

    It’s a strange and irresponsible preference. More than that, it’s an illegal one. 8 U.S.C. Section 1253(d) commands that:

    On being notified by the [DHS Secretary] that the government of a foreign country denies or unreasonably delays accepting an alien who is a citizen, subject, national, or resident of that country after the [DHS Secretary] asks whether the government will accept the alien under this section, the Secretary of State shall order consular officers in that foreign country to discontinue granting immigrant visas or nonimmigrant visas, or both, to citizens, subjects, nationals, and residents of that country until the [DHS Secretary] notifies the Secretary that the country has accepted the alien.

    (emphasis added)

    In sum, the lawless behavior of the State Department, beginning under Hillary Clinton, has created a threat to public safety in America. That will be worth remembering when criminal aliens released because of the State Department’s unwillingness to follow the law commit grisly crimes in the future.

    Hillary Clinton might be a shoe-in for the presidency if only she had done no harm as Secretary of State. Having failed in multiple ways to meet this low standard, she is not a shoe-in.

    POSTED ON MAY 15, 2014 BY PAUL MIRENGOFF IN CRIME, HILLARY CLINTON, IMMIGRATION, LAW

  4. STUDY: 1 MILLION SEX CRIMES BY ILLEGALS

    Based on a one-year in-depth study, a researcher estimates there are about 240,000 illegal immigrant sex offenders in the United States who have had an average of four victims each.
    Deborah Schurman-Kauflin of the Violent Crimes Institute in Atlanta analyzed 1,500 cases from January 1999 through April 2006 that included serial rapes, serial murders, sexual homicides and child molestation committed by illegal immigrants.
    She found that while the offenders were located in 36 states, most were in states with the highest numbers of illegal immigrants. California had the most offenders, followed by Texas, Arizona, New Jersey, New York and Florida.
    Schurman-Kauflin concluded that, based on a figure of 12 million illegal immigrants and the fact that more of this population is male than average, sex offenders among illegals make up a higher percentage than offenders in the general population.
    She arrives at the figure of 240,000 offenders – a conservative estimate, she says – through public records showing about 2 percent of illegals apprehended are sex offenders.
    “This translates to 93 sex offenders and 12 serial sexual offenders coming across U.S. borders illegally per day,” she says.
    She points out the 1,500 offenders in her study had a total of 5,999 victims, and each sex offender averaged four victims.
    “This places the estimate for victimization numbers around 960,000 for the 88 months examined in this study,” she declares.
    Schurman-Kauflin breaks down the 1,500 cases reviewed this way:
    • 525, or 35 percent, were child molestations
    • 358, or 24 percent, were rapes
    • 617, or 41 percent, were sexual homicides and serial murders
    Of the child molestations, 47 percent of the victims were Hispanic, 36 percent Caucasian, 8 percent Asian, 6 percent African American and 3 percent other nationalities.
    For the Rest of the story see w ww.wnd. com/2006/05/36410/

  5. .J William Fulbright
    Democratic US Senator 1945-1974
    Voted Against the 1957, 1960 and 1964 Civil Right Acts
    Sighed the Southern Manifesto, Which opposed racial integration in pulic places.
    Received the presidential medal of freedom from Bill Clinton in 1993

    ww.pinterest.com/pin/513058582522353960/

  6. Bill clinton is a racist and should not be “first gentleman” of this country…
    Discussion in ‘Current Events’ started by 2aguy, Tuesday at 9:24 AM.
    bill clinton, a violent rapist, should not be allowed to be the first “gentleman” of the country if we are ever going to move past the racism of the democrat party…….his long list of actions that gave aid and comfort to know racist segregationists should forever bar him from the public square in order for us to move forward….

    As Governor Bill Clinton Kept Confederate Star On The Arkansas Flag

    The state’s General Assembly reaffirmed the parameters of the flag in a 1987 act that Clinton signed. Among other provisions detailing the flag’s features, such as its colors and shapes, there was a line that read, “The blue star above the word ‘ARKANSAS’ is to commemorate the Confederate States of America.” The act met no significant opposition at the time. In the same legislative session, the assembly also settled on an official state song.

    And as his wife…hilary is just as culpable in the racist actions of her husband, who throughout his life has chosen racism over decent, civilized behavior……..and he is also a violent rapist….

    bill clinton (also a violent sexual predator):

    Dedicated a statue to his good friend and political mentor j. william fulbright, an old school racist democrat,

    And awarded this racist democrat and ally of orval faubus the Presidential medal of freedom…..

    and had orval faubus, the guy who used the Arkansas national guard to block the 9 black children from attending the white school….an honored position at his inauguration as Governor of Arkansas………

    imagine a Repulican doing either one of those things or having either one of those actual racists as good friends and political mentors…
    At least 2 women, probably more, Juanita Broderick and Elizabeth Ward Gracen……
    +1,028
    Hillary Clinton is refusing to say whether a Clinton-Gore pin featuring a Confederate flag was part of her husband’s official campaign merchandise.

    Examples of the distinctive red and blue badge, from the 1992 election, are now being sold on Ebay.

    It comes as politicians, including President Obama, called for the Confederate battle flag to be taken down in the state capitol, a week after a white gunman allegedly shot dead nine black worshipers at a church in South Carolina.

    Scroll down for video

    ww.usmessageboard.com/threads/bill-clinton-is-a-racist-and-should-not-be-first-gentleman-of-this-country.426121/page-2

  7. As Governor, Bill Clinton Kept ‘Confederate’ Star On The Arkansas Flag
    Posted: 06/22/2015 3:30 pm EDT Updated: 06/24/2015 5:59 pm EDT Huffington Post

    WASHINGTON — Many Republican presidential contenders say the question of whether to keep the Confederate flag flying outside South Carolina’s Statehouse is a matter for South Carolinians to work out among themselves. Democratic candidates like Hillary Clinton tend to say that the flag — a symbol of racism and oppression to many — ought to come down, especially in the wake of last week’s racially motivated mass shooting in Charleston. (Clinton has not made an official statement about South Carolina’s flag since the shooting, but in 2007 she did say she “would like to see it removed” from the Statehouse grounds.)

    But the former secretary of state, who is now running for president, is not the first Clinton to weigh in on the matter of the Confederacy. The state flag of Arkansas sports 25 white stars and four blue ones. And in 1987, while serving as governor of Arkansas, Bill Clinton signed a bill affirming that one of those blue stars is there in honor of the Confederate States of America.

    A few words here about the Arkansas state flag, which — like most flags — is laden with symbols and references that may not be immediately apparent. According to the Arkansas secretary of state, the flag’s original design, approved by the state legislature in 1913, had only three blue stars, not four. The three blue stars were meant to represent a number of things, including the year of the Louisiana Purchase (1803) and the fact that “Arkansas belonged to three countries (France, Spain, and the United States) before attaining statehood.” Legislators added a fourth blue star in 1923 to acknowledge Arkansas’ membership in the Confederacy from 1861 to 1865.

    The state’s General Assembly reaffirmed the parameters of the flag in a 1987 act that Clinton signed. Among other provisions detailing the flag’s features, such as its colors and shapes, there was a line that read, “The blue star above the word ‘ARKANSAS’ is to commemorate the Confederate States of America.” The act met no significant opposition at the time. In the same legislative session, the assembly also settled on an official state song.

    Arkansas observes a Confederate Flag Day, which is celebrated together with Arkansas Confederate History and Heritage Month and Confederate Memorial Day. Per state code, it is observed on the Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday. In annual gatherings outside the Arkansas Statehouse, participants can “attend and bring examples of the variety of flags used by Arkansas units and of the Confederate government and its army during the War,” according to the Log Cabin Democrat, an Arkansas newspaper.

    Clinton did not publicly object to Confederate Flag Day during his time as governor. The holiday is still being observed: A photo posted to the website of the Sons of Confederate Veterans in Arkansas shows this year’s event.

    Clinton’s affirmation of Arkansas’ history didn’t stop him from criticizing how other states honored the Confederacy, however. In 1992, Clinton called on the state of Georgia to remove a Confederate design from its state flag. Georgia lawmakers had added the Confederate symbol to Georgia’s flag in the 1950s amid a climate of intense and overt hostility to the idea of racial integration. (Georgia finally took the Confederate battle flag off its state flag in 2001.)

    Clinton’s acceptance of his state’s roots also didn’t do much to endear him to South Carolina voters, at least judging by a 1992 campaign stop at the Southern 500 stock car race in Darlington, South Carolina, where numerous Confederate flags could be seen atop car antennas in the infield. While Clinton “worked his way up pit row shaking hands with smiling and friendly drivers,” a strikingly different scene took place in the stands, The New York Times reported:

    And so, when the fact of Mr. Clinton’s presence became known in the minutes just before the start of the race, there came the clash. First the roaring chants from the stand: “We Want Bush! We Want Bush!” and “George Bush! George Bush!” over and over. Mr. Clinton, of course, ignored that, and continued on his way, mounting a platform on a flat-bed truck to open the race with the traditional line, “Gentlemen, start your engines.”
    In the frame, he uttered that line with his customary ease. Outside the frame, no one heard it; the candidate was drowned out by a long, lusty chorus of boos.
    A spokesperson for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

    CORRECTION: Due to an editing error, a previous version of this article incorrectly defined the meaning of a star appearing on the Arkansas state flag. One of the flag’s four stars represents the 1803 Louisiana Purchase, and not the year Arkansas attained state

  8. Virginia Roberts sex slave: Bill Clinton’s ‘Lolita Express’ and the Dalai Lama saves Prince Andrew
    by Anorak | 15th, February 2015

    The story of Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts, the womn who claims she had sex with him him when she was Jeffrey Epstein’s underage sex slave, has slipped down the news cycle.

    Randy Andy seems to have brushed the scare off. Indeed, the London Gazette says Andrew will be made a vice-admiral in the Royal Navy when he turns 55 next week. (And, no, that’s not a pun.)

    Over in the Daily Mail, one of Andrew’s former lovers, Koo ‘Starkers’ Stark, is speaking in his defence. The American-born actress was 26 when she dated the Duke of York after his return from the Falklands War in 1982. They dated er for 18 months. The Duke married Sarah Ferguson in 1986. She says:

    “I know too much about the media and the law courts to allow the disgrace of an innocent man. That is why I have decided to reveal some details of my relationship with Andrew. My view is clear: I believe him to be a good man and I believe I can help rebut, with authority, the allegations against him. Prince Andrew is a dear friend and godfather to my daughter. I’ve only known him to be honourable and honest, with Christian values. I couldn’t shrug off Virginia Roberts’ assassination of his character any more than he has been able to. He was being accused of the very worst kind of behaviour. The stain on his reputation is spilling across his life like blood from a new wound.”

    It all adds up to nothing much at all. But on she goes breaking “32 years of silence” to tell all:

    …my experience of being with Andrew on our first date in Bewicks informed me of the effect he has on any gathering, be it a restaurant, a club or a Royal court. Conversation drops. Body language changes. There is a bow wave of deference. But Ms Roberts will have us believe this extraordinary hour in Prince Andrew’s life passed unchronicled.

    Well, yeah. Do we know everything he does? And, in any case, men of money power cannot be abusers:

    Then, as now, he was very attractive to women. What need would he have for any women to be supplied for ‘forced sex’?
    The Prince, of course, denies any wongdoing. But in case that is not enough, Stark digs deep – very, very deep – and tells us:
    To be publicly and falsely labelled as guilty of sexual misconduct is as wrong as flogging a woman for the crime of being raped. It is fortuitous that I have had the spiritual guidance of his Holiness the Dalai Lama since 1990. Without it, I doubt I would have had the courage to speak out now.

    Case closed! Send the man up.
    Can Bill Clinton employ the DL defence?
    Just a few weeks ago, reports broke that Bill Clinton had flown at least 11 times on “The Lolita Express” — a private plane owned by the mysterious financier and convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein. According to Virginia Roberts, who claims to have been one of Epstein’s many teenaged sex slaves, Clinton also visited Epstein’s private Caribbean retreat, known as “Orgy Island.”

    “I remember asking Jeffrey, ‘What’s Bill Clinton doing here?’ ” Roberts said in 2011. The former president, she added, was accompanied by four young girls during his stay — two of whom were among Epstein’s regular sex partners. “And [Jeffrey] laughed it off and said, ‘Well, he owes me a favor.’ He never told me what favors they were.”

    Clinton also spent years traveling and partying with Ron Burkle, a billionaire bachelor with a penchant for very young girls. Clinton spent so much time on Burkle’s private plane that it came to be known in Burkle’s circle as “Air F—k One.”

    It’s not going to go away with Clinton invoilved, allegedly…

    (I wonder if Bill Clinton has HIV and by way of contraction,,,,,Hillary?)

  9. Bill Clinton Affair With Elizabeth Hurley? Tom Sizemore Claims Model Slept With Former President In White House (REPORT)
    By Melissa Siegel February 05, 2014 10:20 AM

    Reuters
    Did Bill Clinton really have an affair with Elizabeth Hurley during his presidency? A shocking new report claimed Hillary Clinton’s husband slept with the British model for a year and even had sex with her in the White House.
    This bombshell story came from actor Tom Sizemore, who dated Hurley for several years. A new audio recording unearthed by Radar Online supposedly featured Sizemore revealing how he set up Elizabeth Hurley’s affair with Bill Clinton.
    RELATED: Monica Lewinsky Gives Emotional Speech About How She Loved President Clinton
    Per Radar, then-President Bill Clinton met Sizemore at a 1998 White House screening of the film Saving Private Ryan. Clinton then showed the actor the Lincoln Bedroom but quickly began asking Sizemore about his ex.
    “[Bill Clinton asked me] Did you go with Liz Hurley for four years?” Sizemore said on the recording. “Do you still see her?”
    Tom Sizemore then revealed that he was no longer dating Elizabeth Hurley. The President thus asked for the model’s number, though Sizemore was a bit hesitant at first.
    “[Clinton said] Give it to me,” Sizemore continued. “You dumb mother f—er, I’m the Commander-in-Chief of the United States of America. The buck stops here. Give me the damn number.”
    Bill Clinton has not yet commented on the latest cheating allegations.
    Bill Clinton then supposedly dialed Elizabeth Hurley’s number right there in the White House. He then allegedly sent a plane to the model’s house to take her to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
    “She was there for four days,” Tom Sizemore said of Elizabeth Hurley’s supposed affair with Bill Clinton. “He f—ed her that night. I asked [Hurley], what was it like there? … I said was Hillary a problem? And she said ‘No, they sleep in different bedrooms.’ Bill said that, he intimated to Elizabeth that they have been, they’re in love, but they stopped [sleeping together] a long time ago, and they both have separate romantic lives.”
    According to Tom Sizemore, Bill Clinton’s affair with Elizabeth Hurley lasted for about a year. But the President ended things when he felt he was falling in love with the model.
    “At a certain point, he told her, ‘I don’t do love, and I’m beginning to think I might love you,”’ Sizemore concluded.
    Elizabeth Hurley has already denied rumors of an affair with Bill Clinton (Photo: Reuters).
    Radar Online contacted a rep for Elizabeth Hurley, but the spokesperson refused to comment on this alleged Bill Clinton affair. However, the rep did not deny the tabloid rumor, either.
    UPDATE: On Wednesday, Elizabeth Hurley took to Twitter to deny the Bill Clinton affair rumors. “Ludicrously silly stories about me & Bill Clinton,” she wrote. “Totally untrue. In the hands of my lawyers. Yawn.”
    It’s worth noting that Radar Online is not the most reputable source. And while the website does have an audio recording of Tom Sizemore’s remarks, the actor has struggled with drug addiction and thus may not be trustworthy, either.
    Still, the model previously expressed an attraction to politicians. So perhaps this report of a Bill Clinton/Liz Hurley affair is not so far-fetched, after all.
    “Powerful folk can be sexy,” Hurley said in 2010. “I adore Clinton; you know, naughty but nice with a very sexy voice.”

  10. Is Bill Clinton a Racist?
    By MDefl
    Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton’s hatchet man, er.. former President of the United States has taken on a very interesting role in his wife’s campaign. Instead of extolling the virtues of his wife, as he claimed on Letterman would be his role, he has become the attack dog of the Clinton campaign. That is not surprising to me in the least. What is surprising is Bill Clinton’s comments inferring that race playing a major factor in the South Carolina primary. While that may be true, it is unprecedented and unseemly that a former President would inject himself into any political race (even his wife’s) in such a manner. Furthermore, in typical Clinton fashion, it was Clinton himself who brought the issue of race into his wife’s contest against Obama. Click on the AP article below to read what sources in Clinton’s own campaign are saying in regards to Bill Clinton’s inserting of racial issues into the South Carolina primary:
    Now that the primary is behind us, it may be useful to examine the Clinton’s history with the African American community. After all, President Bill Clinton was America’s first black President. Is Bill Clinton a racist? Honestly, I do not know for certain but I want to say no. However, all I see from the Clinton’s history with the African American community is a lot of words and no action. Let’s take a quick look at Bill Clinton’s history with the African American community.
    1. Bill Clinton’s mentor was Senator J. William Fulbright, an avowed segregationist. OK, that is not Bill Clinton’s fault. However, Bill Clinton interned for Fulbright in 1966 while he still was a proponent of segregationism. Is that Clinton’s fault? Yes, he was old enough to know better. Worse yet, Clinton awarded Fulbright with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. Fulbright was a man who voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the 1965 Voters Rights Act and believed in the separation of the races.
    2. As Governor of Arkansas, Clinton was involved in numerous lawsuits that centered around race issues. A simple google search will reveal the details of these lawsuits. One example is after Clinton was sued by the NAACP for failing to enforce The Voters Rights Act in Arkansas in the late 1980’s. Lani Guinier, a one time Clinton nominee stated that Clinton informed a pro-segregation crowd that they were being unfairly targeted because they lost the civil war. How many times have we seen Bill Clinton alter his message in response to what a particular audience wanted to hear? This may not be a case of racism but of political expediency. Again and again, Clinton has demonstrated this behavior. Not that the main stream press outlets would have made the effort to point this out during his 8 years as President.
    3. 8 years as President of the U.S. and how many African Americans did President Bill Clinton nominate for cabinet positions? Ron Brown as Secretary of Commerce, which is NOT one of the most influential cabinet positions. Contrast that with President George W. Bush, who the left often tries to brand a racist. President Bush’s actions (Rice, Powell, etc..) speak much louder than President Clinton’s words. Were there no qualified African American’s in the Democratic party for any significant cabinet position for Bill Clinton’s 8 years in office? What exactly did Bill Clinton accomplish for the African American community while he was in office? I have asked this question to several African Americans (and Clinton supporters) that I know and no one can give me a quick answer.
    4. Playing racial politics in a Presidential race is nothing new to Bill Clinton. Does anyone remember Sister Souljah? Clinton famously compared her to David Duke and claimed that she was just another type of racist. The fact that Sister Souljah was a fairly insignificant and minor figure in her own community was of no concern to Bill Clinton. This was his wink to the Reagan Democrat’s to come home. Again, I believe it was a matter of politics, not racism.
    I have always wanted to believe that Clinton is a political opportunist and not a racist. I am still leaning that way although Clinton’s latest escapades have planted a kernel of doubt in my mind. Despite Obama’s victory in South Carolina, the Clinton’s think that they will win the nomination. It is a simple case of math at this point. Many of the remaining large states contain a significant percentage of Hispanic and Latino’s, groups that favor the Clintons. The ultimate irony is that Obama will accept Hillary’s offer to be her Vice-President candidate (a smart political move for him), and Bill Clinton will once again be known as America’s first Black President. The main stream press will forget all about how the issue of race reared it’s ugly head during the early democratic primary season and in the general election will label the GOP as the party of racists. African American’s will vote for Hillary by a 9 to 1 margin. The Obama route in South Carolina appears to be a repudiation of Clinton’s strategy in South Carolina. However if Hillary wins the nomination, Bill Clinton’s shenanigans in South Carolina will become the playbook for future white Democratic candidates that run against African Americans. That would be a tragedy.

    Sunday, January 27th, 2008 at 5:07 am
    ww.rightpundits.com

  11. Bill Clinton Cheating With ‘Energizer’ Mistress? New Details On Mystery Blonde And Hillary’s Husband Could Affect 2016 Election
    By Melissa Siegel July 22, 2014 2:30 PM

    Bill and Hillary Clinton look happy in public, but behind the scenes the former President is facing another cheating scandal. A 2014 book claims Bill Clinton is secretly having an affair with a woman dubbed the “Energizer.” This comes after the former Secretary of State’s husband reportedly cheated on his wife with women like Elizabeth Ward Gracen, Dolly Kyle Browning, and, of course, Monica Lewinsky.
    Did Bill Clinton really have a secret mistress? A new book claims the former president is having an affair with a woman dubbed the “Energizer” because of how often she is around when Bill’s wife Hillary is not home.
    The story about Bill Clinton and his “Energizer” mistress appears in the upcoming work The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of Presidents. It is written by Ronald Kessler, best known for breaking the story about current President Barack Obama’s secret service agents hiring prostitutes in Colombia.
    This book from Ronald Kessler will reportedly detail Bill Clinton’s extramarital affair.
    Kessler reported that Bill’s Secret Service agents were told to just let “Energizer” go into the Clintons’ Westchester home whenever she came around. This was sometimes just a few minutes after Hillary left the house.
    In fact, keeping “Energizer” hidden from Hillary Clinton reportedly requires the efforts of two groups of Secret Service agents. Hillary’s guards supposedly keep track of when the former Secretary of State will return to the house. They then allegedly tell Bill’s guards, who gets his rumored mistress out of the home before his wife arrives.
    Not much is known about Bill Clinton’s rumored mistress. But at least one Secret Service agent thinks “Energizer” was surgically enhanced.
    “It was a warm day, and she was wearing a low-cut tank top, and as she leaned over, her breasts were very exposed,” the agent told Kessler about Bill Clinton’s mistress, per Page Six. “They appeared to be very perky and very new and full … There was no doubt in my mind they were enhanced.”
    Neither Bill Clinton nor Hillary Clinton has responded to this latest cheating allegation. But it would not be shocking if the former President is having an affair. After all, he famously had an alleged affair with White House intern Monica Lewinsky during his time in office.
    “I myself, deeply regret what happened between me and President Clinton,” Monica Lewinsky recently told Vanity Fair about her affair with Bill. “… At the time—at least from my point of view—it was an authentic connection, with emotional intimacy, frequent visits, plans made, phone calls and gifts exchanged. In my early 20s, I was too young to understand the real-life consequences, and too young to see that I would be sacrificed for political expediency. I look back now, shake my head in disbelief, and wonder: what was I—what were we—thinking?”
    And Bill Clinton has been accused of many affairs since then. Women like former Miss America Elizabeth Ward Gracen and the President’s high school classmate Dolly Kyle Browning have come forward claiming they also had sexual relations with Hillary’s husband.
    More recently, audio emerged of Tom Sizemore claiming Bill Clinton had an affair with the actor’s ex, Elizabeth Hurley. Sizemore said on the tape that the President asked him for Hurley’s number and invited the model to the White House, where Clinton “f—ed her that night.” The actor later denied any knowledge of a Clinton-Hurley affair and insisted he was high on drugs when he talked about this supposed hookup.
    But even if Bill Clinton did not have an affair with Elizabeth Hurley, he does not exactly seem like a faithful husband. So we are sadly not surprised by this “Energizer” story. The only question is whether this new report will convince Hillary to leave her allegedly cheating husband for good. And if she does, will that affect her potential run for president in 2016?

  12. Report: Hillary Made Bill Take HIV Test
    EVAN GAHR
    11/29/2015
    Hillary Clinton once forced her horn dog hubby Bill to get an HIV test because she knew he preferred to do things au naturel with multiple mistresses, according to an explosive new book, “Bill and Hillary: So This Is That Thing Called Love,” the New York Post gossip section “Page Six” reported Sunday night.

    Hillary got tested also. The Clintons drew a collective sigh of relief when they proved negative.

    Authors Darwin Porter and Danforth Prince also claim that Bill waged his own little war on a woman named Jackie Kennedy Onassis at her Fifth Avenue apartment.

    The former First Lady apparently met resistance when she rebuffed his advances. “We almost indulged in a wrestling match. It was most embarrassing,” she allegedly later told longtime Washington Post publisher Katherine Graham.

    “I mean, I was flattered that I turned him on so much at my age, but Bill was just like Jack [Kennedy] in the sense that neither of them wanted to take ‘no’ for an answer. Ever since that day, I prefer not to be alone with Bill.”

    Graham, a notorious gossip, recounted the story to novelist Truman Capote who, quite a yenta himself, circulated it further.

    An unnamed Clinton flack insisted to Page Six that Bill did not try to have sex with that woman, Miss Onassis.

    “[Is it] possible to quote me laughing at the sheer absurdity of this story?” the spokesperson asked rhetorically.

    The book is scheduled for publication on December 21.

    Don’t look for it under the Clintons’ Christmas tree.

    Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2015/11/29/report-hillary-made-bill-take-hiv-test/#ixzz3tDskXWVc

  13. WHEN HILLARY SILENCES THE RAPE VICTIM
    By: Jeffrey Lord | December 30th, 2015
    Juanita Broaddrick is blunt.
    First, there was the accusation of a rape committed by then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton—the man Arkansan Broaddrick was supporting for governor. Broaddrick described the incident this way to Lisa Myers of NBC:

    “Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip … He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen but he wouldn’t listen to me. … It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to ‘Please stop.’ And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip. … When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says ‘You better get some ice on that.’ And he turned and went out the door.”

    In the weeks that followed, Broaddrick was terrified. She had, she claimed, been raped by the state attorney general: a probable governor. In a rare interview in November of 2015 with radio host Aaron Klein, written up here at Breitbart, she went on:

    “I was in a state of shock afterwards,” an emotional Broaddrick said, clearly still impacted by the event. “And I know my nurse came back to the room to check on me because she hadn’t heard from me …She came up and it was devastating to her and to me to find me in the condition that I was in.”

    “We really did not know what to do. We sat and talked and she got ice for my mouth. …It was four times the size that it should be. And she got ice for me and we decided then I just wanted to go home. I just wanted to get out of there, which we did.”

    Two weeks later, she encountered Bill and Hillary Clinton at a political event. Bill avoided her, Hillary did not. Here’s how Broaddrick describes the scene in a 2000 open letter to Hillary:

    “I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton’s bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, “Bill has talked so much about Juanita”, and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand.

    Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

    What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.”

    Stop. Stop, stop, stop.
    What Juanita Broaddrick is describing here is Hillary enabling her husband’s disgusting behavior. She accuses Hillary directly of knowing what Bill did and then directly threatening Broaddrick to be quiet. Which, once upon a time, out of sheer terror, Broaddrick did. And does no longer.
    The moment Hillary Clinton went out there and said of Trump the following, as reported by CNN, Clinton re-opened this old wound. Piously, Hillary said:

    “Nothing really surprises me anymore. I don’t know that he has any boundaries at all. His bigotry, his bluster, his bullying have become his campaign. And he has to keep sort of upping the stakes and going even further.”

    She added, “I don’t respond to him personally, because he thrives on that kind of exchange. I think he has to answer for what he says, and I assume that others will make the larger point about his language. It’s not the first time he’s demonstrated a penchant for sexism. Again, I’m not sure anybody’s surprised that he keeps pushing the envelope.”
    Got all that? Trump is, among other things, sexist and a bully. The fighter that he is—and too many other Establishment Republicans are not—Trump promptly fired back, tweeting:
    Where are all the other GOP candidates?

    1. WHEN HILLARY SILENCES THE RAPE VICTIM
      By: Jeffrey Lord | December 30th, 2015
      Juanita Broaddrick is blunt.
      First, there was the accusation of a rape committed by then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton—the man Arkansan Broaddrick was supporting for governor. Broaddrick described the incident this way to Lisa Myers of NBC:

      “Then he tries to kiss me again. And the second time he tries to kiss me he starts biting my lip … He starts to, um, bite on my top lip and I tried to pull away from him. And then he forces me down on the bed. And I just was very frightened, and I tried to get away from him and I told him ‘No,’ that I didn’t want this to happen but he wouldn’t listen to me. … It was a real panicky, panicky situation. I was even to the point where I was getting very noisy, you know, yelling to ‘Please stop.’ And that’s when he pressed down on my right shoulder and he would bite my lip. … When everything was over with, he got up and straightened himself, and I was crying at the moment and he walks to the door, and calmly puts on his sunglasses. And before he goes out the door he says ‘You better get some ice on that.’ And he turned and went out the door.”

      In the weeks that followed, Broaddrick was terrified. She had, she claimed, been raped by the state attorney general: a probable governor. In a rare interview in November of 2015 with radio host Aaron Klein, written up here at Breitbart, she went on:

      “I was in a state of shock afterwards,” an emotional Broaddrick said, clearly still impacted by the event. “And I know my nurse came back to the room to check on me because she hadn’t heard from me …She came up and it was devastating to her and to me to find me in the condition that I was in.”

      “We really did not know what to do. We sat and talked and she got ice for my mouth. …It was four times the size that it should be. And she got ice for me and we decided then I just wanted to go home. I just wanted to get out of there, which we did.”

      Two weeks later, she encountered Bill and Hillary Clinton at a political event. Bill avoided her, Hillary did not. Here’s how Broaddrick describes the scene in a 2000 open letter to Hillary:

      “I remember it as though it was yesterday. I only wish that it were yesterday and maybe there would still be time to do something about what your husband, Bill Clinton, did to me. There was a political rally for Mr. Clinton’s bid for governor of Arkansas. I had obligated myself to be at this rally prior to my being assaulted by your husband in April, 1978. I had made up my mind to make an appearance and then leave as soon as the two of you arrived. This was a big mistake, but I was still in a state of shock and denial. You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, “Bill has talked so much about Juanita”, and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand.

      Do you remember how you thanked me, saying “we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill”. At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, “Everything you do for Bill”. You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

      What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.”

      Stop. Stop, stop, stop.
      What Juanita Broaddrick is describing here is Hillary enabling her husband’s disgusting behavior. She accuses Hillary directly of knowing what Bill did and then directly threatening Broaddrick to be quiet. Which, once upon a time, out of sheer terror, Broaddrick did. And does no longer.
      The moment Hillary Clinton went out there and said of Trump the following, as reported by CNN, Clinton re-opened this old wound. Piously, Hillary said:

      “Nothing really surprises me anymore. I don’t know that he has any boundaries at all. His bigotry, his bluster, his bullying have become his campaign. And he has to keep sort of upping the stakes and going even further.”

      She added, “I don’t respond to him personally, because he thrives on that kind of exchange. I think he has to answer for what he says, and I assume that others will make the larger point about his language. It’s not the first time he’s demonstrated a penchant for sexism. Again, I’m not sure anybody’s surprised that he keeps pushing the envelope.”
      Got all that? Trump is, among other things, sexist and a bully. The fighter that he is—and too many other Establishment Republicans are not—Trump promptly fired back, tweeting:
      Where are all the other GOP candidates?

      “Hillary, when you complain about “a penchant for sexism,” who are you referring to. I have great respect for women. BE CAREFUL!” Later Trump added: “We all have to fight fairly. She’s playing the woman’s card and it’s like ‘gimme a break.”
      Gimme a break is right. More than right. Here we have a candidate for president—a woman—who is running around America preaching in a campaign ad to “every survivor of sexual assault” that rape victims “… have the right to be heard. You have the right to be believed. We’re with you.” Juanita Broaddrick happened to see that gem and said she “almost died” when she saw it.
      No kidding. The utter hypocrisy here is so thick it would take two chain saws and four blade changes to cut through it.
      The real question here is: Where are all the other GOP candidates? Quiet as church mice. In a year in which rape has been made a cause celebre on college campuses, the American Left falls silent when Juanita Broaddrick speaks out. Recall back in the mists of 2012 when then-Missouri GOP Senate candidate Todd Akin watched his entire campaign implode after he said there was such a thing as “legitimate rape”? Ohhhhh the howls of liberal outrage. President Obama himself stepped into the fray, sternly saying to Jay Leno on the Tonight Show:

      “Let me make a very simple proposition: Rape is rape. It is a crime. And so these various distinctions about rape don’t make too much sense to me — don’t make any sense to me.”

      After which Obama asked Bill Clinton—he, the accused by Ms. Broaddrick—to deliver the speech re-nominating Obama at the Democratic National Convention.
      All of this reminds of another incident in 1990’s history. That would be the 1991 confirmation hearings for Judge Clarence Thomas to be a Supreme Court Justice. Suddenly up popped Anita Hill, a onetime Thomas colleague, who essentially accused Thomas of making off-color remarks, quickly labeled as sexual harassment. All hell broke loose. “Women tell the truth” went the outraged line of the day from the left. Thomas was confirmed. Time passed. Suddenly the Bill Clinton scandals burst on the scene. And there was Juanita Broaddrick with her allegation of rape. Not to mention the lurid tale of Paula Jones, who charged Governor Clinton had summoned her to his hotel suite and proceeded to drop his pants, asking her to “kiss it.” And then there was Kathleen Willey, another Clinton supporter who accused President Clinton of groping her in the small study adjacent to the Oval Office.

      And the reaction? Why, this was only about sex, don’t you know. Accused of far, far more than Clarence Thomas was ever accused of in terms of sexual harassment, now sexual harassment, not to mention the appalling Broaddrick allegations, was just no big deal.

      Let’s be blunt. The hard fact is that the American Left has two sets of rules. If you are black and conservative, like Clarence Thomas, and accused of sexual harassment without proof, the “high tech lynching” (as Thomas called his hearings) is on. If you are a white liberal guy and accusations of rape and sexual harassment emerge, it just doesn’t matter. And if you are Hillary Clinton, and charged with threatening the survivor of sexual assault to be quiet—it simply doesn’t matter.
      The good news? Donald Trump has the guts to stand up and say that if Hillary and company is going to be playing the woman card on him he will have a lot to say in response. And right there is exactly why so many people are cheering Trump on. He is fighting back.

      And, no small thing, so too now are Juanita Broaddrick and Kathleen Willey. Says the latter? “Hillary is the war on women.” Exactly.
      It is time…past time…for this candidate and the left in general to be asked a simple question. Is President Obama right? Is it true that “rape is rape”? Is rape a crime? And exactly what is right about threatening the victim to be silent?
      It will be a very interesting election year.

      – See more at: https://www.conservativereview.com/commentary/2015/12/when-hillary-silences-the-rape-victim#sthash.QWOg6v7c.dpuf

  14. Connie Commenter

    Perhaps because I am 79 years old, my eyes are wide open as far as what the media is up to in this country. I found it necessary to slam my ears shut at least ten years ago to anything political that these miserable, fawning people have to say about conservative candidates. What is sad is that it took so long for me to see what the news media was really doing. It’s called subtle *and inexcusable) indoctrination.

  15. Only five? I can think of more than that. If those guys knew what Hillary really thinks of them they would not even walk in that direction.

    Google “Two Minute Conservative” for sharp thinking.

  16. Folks this is real simple to me. If you are NOT a lefty, if you don’t support the left agenda, stop buying, listening to, watching, going to liberal actors movies. Simply put stop supporting anything or anyone who is a left agenda freak. I don’t think any of these media, entertainment sources can survive on “left” only supporters. Boycott them, Boycott them all. Small sacrifice.

    1. Try this! When you see something on TV or a newspaper that makes your blood boil, jot down the station’s advertisers that are supporting that crap. Visit those advertisers and let them know “nicely” what you find wrong on that media. Don’t just tell the cashier, try and tell a manager or better yet, an owner. Pass the list around to everyone you know that is sick and tired of it too so they can do the same. Also offer it up for discussion at any group meetings you’re involved with. You’d be amazed how stores will listen and maybe react. A little legwork can change things.

  17. And what about the 5,000,000 times that the Media proved that it was owned by Right-Wingnut Billionaires pushing their agenda and fed us their propaganda pablum? If five times is all you can come up with, then you have disproved your own thesis.

  18. The same liberals who are complaining that Donald Trump got all the medias attention, fail to mention that the only reason the media are doing that is to malign & destroy his campaign. All that ‘free’ publicity is the result of liberal bias. Now, as the political season ramps up, it is hilarious to see how all the rhino/liberal/media bashing has produced a candidate they mutually ‘hate’ so much that “We the People” are catapulting Mr. Trump to the Presidency!

    1. No, it is just news coverage. The mediumses may have some employees who would like to malign & destroy his campaign. However, they are covering him with just the camera straight on, hoping he will destroy himself with his dominant condition of arrogant ignorance. The reason he has not done this yet is because years of Republican propaganda and lies have rendered the Republican base incapable of rational thought. Trump’s bloviating appeals to the GOP base because they have been taught to accept the most outrageous lies. Donald Trump is the harvest from the GOP’s cultivation of misinformation.

      1. Pat, your comment, “The reason he has not done this yet is because years of Republican propaganda and lies have rendered the Republican base incapable of rational thought.”
        Simply put, what you said is one of the most ignorant and irrational statements I have ever read.
        You must be one of the trolls people talk about, the ones who come onto sites just to stir up trouble. Get a life and post something worth reading.

  19. The liberals in the media doesn’t say much for what these idiots are learning about journalism. They all look like fawning fools and they don’t have the sense to look back on their actions and remarks, be embarrassed and try to change their ways. I guess they have been brainwashed since they attended the indoctrinating liberal school system run by the U.S. Government. If not, they surely learned nothing from college.

    1. Agreed. Our universities are brainwashing our children with their liberal propaganda. Had I the opportunity to do it all over again I never would have sent my children through college, I would have preferred for them to learn from an unbiased base rather told what is right and wrong based on the beliefs of some screwball secular atheist/agnostic professor I have never met, one with no moral and ethical compass, as a result he dictates his irrational thought processes to our youth who may soak it up like a thirsty sponge.
      Many on the left feed upon the young teaching God is dead feel good scenarios and existential thought. Logic has been replaced with feelings, the Nike slogan “if it feels good do it” seems to be alive and well. I wonder if they knew what the impact their advertising slogan would have on society, I cannot allow them that level of credibility. The slogan most likely came from someone who lived through the 60’s flower child years now grown up and making money off the very thing they were fighting against.
      Youth, hopefully, after their brainwashing has run it’s course, they return to the very foundation responsible and reasonable parents built for them. I suppose it is a live and learn thing, similar to cause and effect, place your hand in the fire once or better yet don’t do it at all, the problem is too many of todays youth are being taught to test the fire while reasonable people know better. That is what logic and reason is all about, however it appears logic and reason are being shelved now more than ever by the existentialists misguiding our children, or if you prefer, young adults.
      God is not dead, therefore I can rebuke the existentialists and unreasonable thinkers on both sides of the aisle based on the objective outside base of authority God has delivered to us through the bible. Like it or not this is the only way to have the authority to proclaim any absolutes with regard to what is right and what is wrong.

  20. 24 hour coverage of Donald Trump is liberal media bias? He hasn’t even invested a penny in campaign commercials because he doesn’t have to! The media gives it to him for free!
    All this, while a true candidate for the masses (Bernie Sanders) is hardly even covered!

  21. BO is a muslim and therefore not worthy of his position. He has been the negative force at work here in the USA. Donations with our tax money to our enemies, and constantly performing acts of USA destructive forces. His 23 Jihadist camps that have been training with AK-47’s makes you wonder how they happen to acquire the ones legal citizens cannot acquire.

Leave a Comment

Scroll to Top