Judge Andrew Napolitano is as good as his word. A couple of months ago, Fox News suspended him because they thought he was giving out inaccurate information about British Intelligence helping Barack Obama spy on Americans when he was President.
When Napolitano came back from suspension, he was asked if he would change his story, and he said no. Not even a week later, CNN reported a British intel agency gave Obama data, just like Napolitano has previously said.
Then, Senator Rand Paul dropped two bombshells: First, that the Obama administration spied on him during the 2016 campaign, and also that another Senator was spied on.
Starting to see a pattern?
Napolitano now added even more fuel to the fire: he claims that former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia told him that he felt the court was being surveilled “often.”
There have to be some records somewhere to back this claim up. The federal bureaucracy couldn’t have destroyed all that paperwork and cleaned up their tracks. There’s got to be proof somewhere.
Source: Fox Business
Justice Scalia told me that he often thought the court was being surveilled. And he told me that probably four or five years ago… If they had to unmask Senator Paul’s name to reveal a conversation he was having with a foreign agent and the foreign agent was hostile to the United States they can do that. That’s not what he’s talking about. They’re talking about unmasking him when he’s having a conversation with his campaign manager when he’s running in the Republican primary.
Watch the segment below:
Did you hear Maria Bartiromo say “wow?” That’s how I felt when I heard the news. Napolitano wouldn’t have said it to gain points with anyone, he said it because it’s the truth. Power corrupts and there was nobody more corrupt than Obama.
I just wish we had some investigators that didn’t care about their political futures and wanted to find out the truth for America. That’s what we need but we aren’t seeing too much of that and thus, we all suffer.
Share with me if you believe the Supreme Court was under surveillance. Do you think Scalia was right? Add this article to your Facebook/Twitter page and alert your friends.
