As you all remember, Loretta Lynch likely played a major role in helping get Hillary Clinton off the hook near the conclusion of the FBI’s investigation into her private email server use.
Right before Hillary emerged from the investigation unscathed, Lynch and Bill Clinton had a secret meeting at an airport in Phoenix. If it wasn’t for a journalist getting a lucky tip, we would’ve never known about the meeting, which they tried to play off as coincidental. It was quickly learned that the meeting was planned – and went on for about a half-hour.
Suspicious? You bet.
Whether or not they were discussing anything pertaining to the FBI’s investigation is impossible to know, but it’s hard to imagine them talking about anything besides it. In fact, that’s especially true, because when Comey briefly reopened the FBI’s investigation into Hillary, Lynch didn’t want the public to know the FBI was re-launching its investigation.
Even liberals like Diane Feinstein wanted answers from Lynch – and we may soon be getting them.
A bipartisan group of Senate Judiciary Committee members sent a letter to former Attorney Loretta Lynch Friday seeking to confirm if she attempted to stifle the FBI investigation into the Hillary Clinton email probe. Members gave Lynch a deadline to answer their questions by July 6.
Citing May 3, 2017 testimony from former FBI Director James Comey — who expressed concern about the Obama Justice Department — and the June 2016 meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton, the lawmakers asked the former attorney general to answer further questions about her relationship with not only the Clintons but also the Democratic National Committee.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, Ranking Member Dianne Feinstein, Subcommittee Chairman Lindsey Graham, and Ranking Subcommittee Member Sheldon Whitehouse asked Lynch to answer questions that include:
- “Did anyone from the FBI ever discuss or otherwise mention to you emails, memos, or reports such as those described in these media reports?”
- “During your time in the Justice Department, did you ever have communications with Rep. Wasserman Schultz, her staff, her associates, or any other current or former DNC officials about the Clinton email investigation? If so, please describe the communications and provide all records relating to them.”
- “To the best of your knowledge, did any of your Justice Department staff or your other associates communicate with Rep. Wasserman Schultz, her staff, her associates, or any other current or former DNC officials about the Clinton email investigation? If so, please describe the communications and provide all records relating to them.”
H/T The Daily Caller
And of course, if she’s guilty of aiding Hillary to get her out of trouble – Hillary is just as guilty for accepting the help.
Hopefully the Senate Judiciary Committee gets to the bottom of what actually happened with Loretta Lynch and the Clintons. The American people deserve the truth.
[totalpoll id=”106503″]
Do you think Lynch obstructed justice to defend the Clintons? Share your thoughts below, and share this story on Facebook and Twitter!
I THINK, I KNOW SHE’S GUILTY
she is guilty and so is the dirtbag she took over from
I think that she is just one of many in the Obama Administration that is as corrupt as it gets and she should be made to pay a price! What I can’t figure out is, as many ways as the Clintons and Lynch had to connect and talk with all of their resources available to them, why did they pick a way that would be seen by many folks on the tarmac of an airport? It just doesn’t make any sense!
Coordinating with the Hellary campaign, sure, why not? Obama had launched an investigation, but then turned it into a sham. Sweet Loretta was the Lynch pin. No subpoenas, no warrants; no searches of homes and offices; no seizing of computers, other devices & servers; no grand jury impaneled; no charging witnesses to pressure them to cooperate, no sweating witnesses during interrogation; allowing Cheryl Mills to be a potential target, a percipient witness and Clinton’s lawyer all at once; giving out agreements not to prosecute like candy on Halloween; no follow up questions for Hellary, no search of her medical records; no squeezing of Anthony Weiner or Doug Band, the weakest links; no expansion of the investigation to the Clinton Foundation; no arrests, no charges, no indictments. All of these are matters within the Attorney General’s discretion; they are her powers and authority to exercise lawfully as she sees fit. But they amount to a pattern of behavior that is immoral and unethical. It should be a scandal in and of itself.
They’ll never get any admission out of that hag about anything. I won’t be holding my breath for her to be busted but we can hope.
I may be wrong, but believe if you are brought before the congress to answer questions that regardless of whether you plead the 5th Amendment or not, congress can hold you in contempt for not answer their questions. By law, you can take the 5th, but that does not absolve you of providing truthful answers. If she pleads the 5th then congress should have the Sergent at Arms arrest and jail her. Now, do I think that will happen. Of course not. Has anything ever happened as a result of a multitude of investigations during the last 8 years? More drama shows on the capitol hill stage.
Lynch deserves everything she gets and much more. Lets see if justice is only for the sheeple. If Lynch goes down she will take Obama and Hillary with her. Lynch does not appear to be someone to bit the bullet and protect others. Like most Liberals it is about her and no one else. Lynch will toss any one under the bus to protect herself, this of course could result in an accident, robbery or maybe a heart attack. Liberals have a long track record in the department of shutting up those who do not follow the progressive Liberal rules. Either way it would be no loss!
I find it delightfully ironic that the bleeding heart liberals are now the subject of investigations that they started against President Trump. Ah, revenge is sweet! Is Lynch going to fall on her sword? Mr. Comey is feeling pretty smug now. He was furious that Trump fired him and he now wants to take Ms. Lynch down, too. Ain’t politics grand?
loretta lynch will without doubt follow the orders given to her by her masters. She will lie, “Not recall”, and say “I am not personally aware”. She will follow the example of others before her and “I am not able to give an answer to that question” or the best one yet, “I respectfully and upon advise of my attorney, invoke my 5th Amendment right,
Sad to say that nothing will be accomplished.
I hope they break her and she squeals like the RAT that she is. I look for her too plead the 5th. She does not want to incriminate herself but she is already deeply involved in the corruption.Just part of the SCUM in the White House.
In the White House., or did you mean the Obama White House.
I don’t see any openings to also investigate LL’s involvement with the IRS scandal suppression. There should have been jail time there.
L. Lynch deserves everything she gets and much more. Lets see if
justice is only for the sheeple, or will she skate by.