The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has denied the District’s request for a rehearing of their unconstitutional concealed carry law, which the court previously struck down – and the decision could put the case on a path to the Supreme Court.
Court Rejects DC’s En Banc Request: ‘Good Reason’ for Concealed Carry Remains Unconstitutional https://t.co/b0Y0YFNHVW
— 2A America News (@2AAmericaNews) September 28, 2017
In July, a Circuit Court three-judge panel ruled 2-to-1 that D.C.’s “good cause” requirement to obtain a concealed carry permit violates the Second Amendment. In the 38-page opinion, Judge Thomas B. Griffith wrote: “The good-reason law is necessarily a total ban on most D.C. residents’ right to carry a gun in the face of ordinary self-defense needs. Bans on the ability of most citizens to exercise an enumerated right would have to flunk any judicial test.”
Remarkably, no judge on the Court asked to rehear the case afterward, and on Thursday they officially decided not to rehear it. Chris Cox, Executive Director of the National Rifle Association’s Institute for Legislative Action, applauded the decision: “We applaud the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals for reaffirming the rights of ordinary, law-abiding citizens to carry firearms to protect themselves and their families in the District of Columbia. The District’s draconian restrictions on core Second-Amendment rights are out of step with the mainstream protections in the rest of the country, and as the D.C. Circuit’s opinion shows, they are equally out of step with our Nation’s traditions and fundamental law.”
This is certainly a victory for law-abiding gun owners living in D.C., but the District could decide to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court. Heightening the likelihood of the Supreme Court’s involvement is the fact that the D.C. Court’s decision has created a Circuit split: In June, the Ninth Circuit court ruled in favor of San Diego’s “good cause” clause.
The good new is, if the Supreme Court does take up the case it’s likely that they’ll rule in favor of the Second Amendment – especially with Justice Neil Gorsuch on the Court. And why shouldn’t they rule in favor of our right to keep and bear arms? The Second Amendment doesn’t stop outside the threshold of our homes.
Support Conservative Voices!
Sign up to receive the latest political news, insight, and commentary delivered directly to your inbox.
Share this if you support the D.C. circuit court’s decision to uphold Americans’ Second Amendment rights!
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.comTrump Said ‘We’ll See’ If Price Will Be Fired. What Happened To The Other ‘We’ll See’s’?
Leave a Comment
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
That pesky part about keep(to own) & bear(to carry on one’s person) just keeps tripping up the LibTards who hate the thought of an armed independent populace!
It’s too bad that the citizens of OR, don’t get the same Justice from their Federal Courts, when
the Governor revokes all carrying permits, and orders Police to confiscations all firearms from law abiding citizens.
Looks like win one and Lose a huge case in a whole state. Our Federal courts don’t even interfere with the Governor’s executive order. Where is the NRA, and what have they done to stop this illegal act?
………………………………. I support the Second Amendment 100% ……………………………………
No pain, no gain. All of these issues are ‘running’ the courts and affirming the Constitution again and again. Ben’s admonition…”…if you can keep it…”. is in full force today as it was then..and faster now, since we don’t need a horse to carry the news (and I have horses as well as wi-fi).
cause dems cant be trusted thats why\