Quantcast
Skip to main content



This site works best in IE9 and up and in other modern web browsers

Former AG Says Schiff May Have Broken The Law With Subpoena Of Nunes Phone Records

Former Attorney General Michael Mukasey has questioned the legality of Adam Schiff’s recent acquisition of phone records for five individuals, one of whom is House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes.

Schiff Is In Hot Water

Schiff is already facing criticism of his actions as Democratic members of Congress pursue impeachment of President Donald Trump. But, in what is being called a “stunning abuse of congressional power,” Schiff divulged the phone records of Nunes, Rudy Guiliani, and others during a recent session of the impeachment inquiry.

Though denying he ordered the subpoena of Nunes’ records, Schiff defended it, arguing that it is common practice for investigators to use phone records to corroborate or contradict a witness’s testimony.  And while the Intelligence Committee is said to have given written request to Mr. Guiliani on September 30, Schiff — already called a hypocrite for past impeachment stances — reportedly disregarded the two-week wait for Guiliani to comply and sent the subpoena to the attorney’s phone carrier the same day. The data collected shows only phone numbers and durations of calls; the contents of such calls and texts are not documented.

RELATED: Schiff’s Past Comments On Clinton Impeachment Come Back To Haunt Him – Expose Him As A ‘Hypocrite’

Mukasey Reveals Exactly How Schiff Violated The Law

Regardless of what was included in the records, Mukasey says Congress lacks the legal ability to subpoena records from a phone company directly, an action limited to law enforcement agencies or in life-threatening cases. Law-makers themselves are not given that power. The question remains as to how Congress actually acquired the subpoenaed information, and Mukasey wants an explanation from the head of the impeachment inquiry.

Republican Senator Rand Paul is outraged at Schiff, insisting he abused the congressional ability to write its own subpoenas and circumvent normal subpoena processes.

As a standard, “attorney-client privilege is assumed unless there is evidence of a crime by the attorney,” said Paul, who criticized both Congress and Schiff as those who “don’t think they need to follow this standard.”

RELATED: Devin Nunes Embarrasses Schiff – His Lying Is So Bad He Needs ‘Rehabilitation’

Mukasey Doubles Down

Mukasey echoed Paul’s concern, telling the Wall Street Journal that the pursuit of Guiliani “raises questions of work-product and attorney-client privilege.”

Congressman Nunes says he will pursue legal action and expressed concern over the breach in constitutional privacy, as well as questioning the ethics of one member of congress dragging another down due to political animosity.