Supreme Court Defends Constitution Without Judicial Overreach

The Supreme Court has once again demonstrated that defending the Constitution doesn't require activist judges rewriting the law from the bench. This point-counterpoint analysis examines how SCOTUS justices preserved constitutional principles while respecting the proper limits of judicial authority. The distinction matters enormously: real constitutionalism means interpreting the law as written, not imposing personal policy preferences under the guise of jurisprudence. Read more about this...