By J.D. Davidson (The Center Square)
Democrats objected Thursday afternoon to unanimous passage of Sen. J.D. Vance’s proposed legislation that would ban federal mask mandates through the end of 2024.
Experience The Political Insider without ads
Without unanimous passage, Vance’s bill must work through Senate committees before possibly being returned to the floor for a vote.
Sen. Ed Markey, D-Massachusetts, objected on the Senate floor, saying the bill is a distraction and misleading, saying every health care option should be available to officials at the local level.
“This bill is a red herring. It’s a distraction. It’s misleading and it’s meant to distract what the GOP stands for right now, which is gimmicks,” Markey said. “They will make us less safe because they will be tying the hands of health care professionals.”
Experience The Political Insider without ads
Vance, R-Ohio, said the legislation does not stop anyone from wearing a mask and allows local communities to make their own mask decisions. It would prevent a federal mandate.
“The legislation doesn’t prevent anyone from wearing a mask,” Vance said. “What I would like is for the freedom of a school child to not be thrown out of class because he doesn’t wear a mask. We are about to have some serious respiratory problems. We always do in the fall, and maybe it will be worse this fall and this winter than before. I think that what our children need is for us not to be chicken little about every single little respiratory problem. We cannot repeat the anxiety, the stress and the nonstop panic of the last couple of years.”
Related: Here’s Where Mask Mandates Have Returned – So Far
On Tuesday, Vance announced the proposed legislation that would stop any federal official, including the president, from implementing a mask mandate through the end of next year.
It would stop mandates for domestic air travel, public transit systems or primary and secondary schools, along with colleges and universities.
It would also stop airlines, transit authorities and educational institutions from refusing to serve anyone not wearing a mask.
Support Conservative Voices!
Sign up to receive the latest political news, insight, and commentary delivered directly to your inbox.
Co-sponsors include Sens. John Barrasso, R-Wyoming; Josh Hawley, R-Missouri; Eric Schmitt, R-Missouri; Mike Braun, R-Indiana; Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyoming; Roger Marshall, R-Kansas; Ted Budd, R-North Carolina; Marsha Blackburn, R-Tennessee; and Katie Britt, R-Alabama.
Read Next: 2020 All Over Again: COVID Is Back And Now So Are Black Lives Matter Protests
Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.
Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com
Greg Abbott’s Office Mocks ‘Hypocrite’ Eric Adams After NYC Mayor’s Xenophobic Rant About Illegals ‘Destroying’ The City
Leave a Comment
COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.
I believe it is a person,s right to chose. All the scientific data proves these work in less than 20% of the time. They do not stop the spread or reduce the number of people getting the virus. If a person want to wear one then let them but lets not discriminate against those that dont. The government shouldn’t dictate this. I feel if a business want to implement these masks and others don’t ill just shop at the ones that dont. Most businesses I been at this k that it should be their choice and not u clean bidens.
Dont be fooled Americans – The only reason the Dems want mask mandates right before the elections is so their next wave of slave minions can riot and cheat the elections without being identified. Its simply that and only that…