Atlantic Editor Admits A Key Claim In Trump Hit Piece Could Be Wrong

By 
·Updated:

Editor’s Note: The headline has been updated to make it clear that Jeffrey Goldberg’s admission related specifically to first-hand accounts which contradict The Atlantic’s claim that President Trump lied about weather being the cause of his 2018 cancelled visit to Aisne-Marne American Cemetery. More of The Atlantic editor Jeffrey Goldberg’s quote from the CNN interview has also been added for context.

Jeffrey Goldberg, Editor-in-Chief for The Atlantic, confessed that the central claim in his publication’s reprehensible hit piece on the President could very well be false.

The Atlantic column starts off with a claim that the President did not want to visit the Aisne-Marne American Cemetery near Paris in 2018, because “his hair would become disheveled in the rain” and that “he did not believe it important to honor American war dead.”

Remember – this is the lede to the piece and sets up every other argument throughout, like the claim that Trump despises the military and veterans, and referred to them as “suckers” and “losers.”

Goldberg’s acceptance of Bolton’s account means that the claim by his four, off-the-record, anonymous sources that the visit was called off for any reason other than weather may not be correct.

When presented with an excerpt from former national security adviser John Bolton’s book which details how the weather was the cause for cancellation of the visit to the cemetery, not a decision by POTUS over his hair, Goldberg conceded, “I’m sure all of those things are true.”

RELATED: John Bolton: Claims That Trump Disparaged Fallen Soldiers Are ‘Simply False’

Goldberg Still Stands By His Reporting

Not only did Bolton inadvertently provide evidence that Goldberg’s ‘Swift Boat’ attempt of the President was factually incorrect in at least this one aspect, but he followed up in a subsequent interview with Fox News to reiterate the story was false.

“According to what that article said, the president made disparaging remarks about soldiers and people buried in the cemetery in connection with the decision for him not to go to the ceremony that was planned that afternoon,” Bolton stated, “and that was simply false.”

He continued, “I don’t know who told the author that, but that was false.”

The central claim of the story is certifiably fake news, and the American people are supposed to believe the other things your anonymous sources said? That’s not how this works.

Still, Goldberg is standing by the bulk of the story. While he acknowledged that Bolton’s counterclaim about the weather cancellation was true, Goldberg went on to add:

“I’ve heard from people in the Pentagon who, Marines, who are a bit insulted that the idea that the Marines couldn’t fly a helicopter in the rain.

“But the larger point is, is that Donald Trump expressed directly to senior aides his lack of desire to go to the cemetery and not to risk 90 minutes in traffic because he doesn’t understand why one would go pay that level of respect to fallen American soldiers.”

CNN asked the Editor to respond to President Trump’s denials that the comments were ever made.

“I would be willing to swear on anything that I never said that about our fallen heroes,” the President said. “There is nobody that respects them more. So, I just think it’s a horrible, horrible thing.”

He added, “What animal would say such a thing?”

Goldberg replied, “Uh, I stand by my reporting. I have multiple sources saying this is what happened, so I stand by it.”

RELATED: John Bolton’s Book Refutes Claims In Anonymously Sourced Atlantic Hit Piece Against Trump

About Those Sources

Goldberg can stand by those sources all he wants, but it says something about his journalistic integrity that he is willing to run a story based on accounts from four anonymous sources instead of actually researching their claims.

Claims that, by now, have been denied by 21 people overall, and over a dozen who had first-hand knowledge of events that took place during the trip in question.

The Atlantic has four nameless sources, while the President has the following backing him up:

At least fourteen of the aforementioned people were on the trip in which these anonymous sources claim the President disparaged veterans.

[totalpoll id=”208442″]

In a perfect world, the Trump administration wouldn’t need to publish so many denials of the story.

In a perfect world, the left-leaning, pro-Biden media would instead be fair, impartial, and balanced in their reporting, never running a story with so many holes in it from so many weak sources.

By Rusty Weiss
Rusty Weiss has been covering politics for over 15 years. His writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, Fox ... More about Rusty Weiss
Exit mobile version