Politics

Texas Files Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Battleground States For ‘Unconstitutional’ Election Law Changes

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has filed a lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, charging that the battleground states implemented unconstitutional changes to their election laws prior to 2020.

Paxton filed the suit with the United States Supreme Court just before midnight on Monday.

“The four states exploited the COVID-19 pandemic to justify ignoring federal and state election laws and unlawfully enacting last-minute changes, thus skewing the results of the 2020 General Election,” a statement on the lawsuit suggests.

“The battleground states flooded their people with unlawful ballot applications and ballots while ignoring statutory requirements as to how they were received, evaluated and counted.”

The suit itself contends that regardless of intent – well-meaning or otherwise – the changes to election laws were “unconstitutional” and “made the 2020 election less secure in the Defendant States.”

RELATED: GOP Lawmakers Demand Bill Barr Perform A Forensic Audit on the Election

Texas Files Supreme Court Lawsuit Against Battleground States of Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania

Of particular interest in the Texas lawsuit against Georgia, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania, is that they are requesting that the Supreme Court order those states to allow their legislatures to appoint the electors.

Each of those states holds a Republican majority legislature following the 2020 election.

“By ignoring both state and federal law, these states have not only tainted the integrity of their own citizens’ vote, but of Texas and every other state that held lawful elections,” Paxton contends.

“Their failure to abide by the rule of law casts a dark shadow of doubt over the outcome of the entire election,” he continued. “We now ask that the Supreme Court step in to correct this egregious error.”

The Washington Times reports that the “motion is seeking to have the high court order the legislatures of those four states to choose presidential electors, presumably for President Trump.”

RELATED: Exclusive: Team Trump’s Top Lawyer On What Comes Next, Plan To Protect Election Integrity

Trump Attorney Suggested This Course of Action a Month Ago

In an exclusive interview with The Political Insider just one day after the election, Jenna Ellis, a top Trump campaign lawyer, revealed what the President’s legal team might do to protect the integrity of the election.

She mentioned the electoral strategy in analyzing how the Electoral College actually works.

Ellis explained that it is the state legislatures who choose who become the electors, and on December 14, those electors actually cast the votes.

“The constitution says in article 2 that the state legislatures are the ones that select the method of choosing their electors,” Ellis explained.

She specifically mentioned Pennsylvania, where Democrat officials extended ballot-counting deadlines due to increased use of mail-in ballots in the midst of a pandemic.

“What (the) Pennsylvania state legislature has done is, they have not acted in the last nine months,” Ellis revealed. “They have not changed their election law.”

“What’s happened is that governors, that state attorneys general, that secretaries of state, that clerks have tried to manipulate in Democrat-controlled states and local precincts,” she noted. “They have tried to manipulate the election law according to their advantage.”

“That is unconstitutional because only state legislatures, according to our U.S. Constitution, can do that.”

While Trump’s team isn’t coordinating with the Texas AG, it’s clear they’re on the same page regarding the Constitutional process.

“These non-legislative changes to the Defendant States’ election laws facilitated the casting and counting of ballots in violation of state law,” Paxton’s lawsuit contends, “which, in turn, violated the Electors Clause of Article II, Section 1, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution.”

The fact that Texas’ motion heads directly to the Supreme Court could have major ramifications for the President’s battle in contesting the 2020 election.

Rusty Weiss

Rusty Weiss is a freelance writer focusing on the conservative movement and its political agenda. He has been following and analyzing the political climate for several years, and his writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, FoxNews.com and more.

Recent Posts

Hillary Clinton Pounces On Trump FBI Raid, Now Fundraising With ‘But Her Emails’ Merchandise

Two-time presidential election loser Hillary Clinton tried capitalizing on news of the FBI raid on…

27 mins ago

Biden’s 2020-2021 White House Payroll – At $100.7 Million – Is Highest Ever

By Adam Andrzejewski for RealClearPolicy The payroll for White House staff under President Joseph Biden…

1 hour ago

Illinois Officials Hid That Chemicals Were In Drinking Water

By Adam Andrzejewski for RealClearPolicy Even though there were many warning signs that the drinking…

2 hours ago

10 Ways To Reduce High Energy Prices That Won’t Cost Taxpayers $740 Billion

By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square) Rather than impose higher taxes and more restrictions on…

3 hours ago

‘Some Third World Bulls***’ – Dan Bongino Goes Ballistic On Fox News Over FBI Raid of Trump’s Home

Fox News weekend host Dan Bongino, a former Secret Service agent, unleashed his anger over…

3 hours ago

Trump Speaks: Angrily Condemns ‘Political Persecution’ As FBI Raids Mar-a-Lago

Former President Donald Trump slammed never-ending "political persecution" by Democrats as he confirmed his Mar-a-Lago…

4 hours ago