Source: Screenshot YouTube
By Kevin Bessler (The Center Square)
A new study is shedding light on the outcomes of states that placed restrictions on residents and businesses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Paragon Health Institute compared the degree of state government response measures developed by Oxford University to health, economic and educational outcome measures in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The index measured government interventions including state-enforced closures of businesses, schools, and other recreational facilities; restrictions on public gatherings; and masking and social distancing requirements.
Co-author and American Well-being Initiative Director Dr. Joel Zinberg said states with fewer restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic outperformed states like Illinois that implemented more restrictions.
“The important finding of our study is that states that imposed more severe lockdown measures did not do any better than states that were less restrictive in terms of health, and they did much worse in terms of economic and educational outcomes,” Zinberg said.
The study showed severe government interventions strongly correlated with worse economic outcomes, with increased unemployment and decreased GDP, and also worse educational outcomes with fewer days of in-person schooling.
Related: Whitmer Says Her COVID Restrictions In Hindsight ‘Don’t Make A Lot Of Sense’
In March 2020, Gov. J.B. Pritzker issued stay-at-home orders that lasted for months. In May, in the face of increasing disregard of the restrictions, some states loosened restrictions while Illinois stayed completely shut down.
The governor’s office even increased the penalty for businesses that violated the orders and reopened.
Zinberg said Illinois’ restrictions resulted in average health outcomes for residents, comparable to Florida which instituted few restrictions on residents. He added the restrictions most likely exacerbated the state’s outmigration as people voted with their feet and fled states with severe restrictions.
“There was a significant correlation between a state’s degree of lockdown and outmigration,” Zinberg said. “In other words, people were fleeing with more severe restrictions to states with less severe restrictions.”
Illinois has seen its population decline for nine consecutive years, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Between July 1, 2021, and July 1, 2022, the state lost 110,127 on net.
Paragon recommended that in future pandemics, policymakers should avoid prolonged, and generalized restrictions and instead carefully tailor government responses to specific areas, and balance the health benefits against the economic, educational and social costs of specific response measures.
Read Next: Man Accused In $83.6 Million Fraudulent COVID-19 Testing Scheme Out On Bond
Syndicated with permission from The Center Square.
By Casey Harper (The Center Square) The U.S. Senate voted 52-46 Thursday to overturn President…
Newly released January 6th security footage at the Capitol shows Nancy Pelosi's daughter continuing to…
Former White House press secretary Jen Psaki argued that many Republicans are actually "comfortable" with…
By Bethany Blankley (The Center Square) With an unknown volume of fentanyl and other drugs…
Alabama Governor Kay Ivey roasted the former sports network ESPN with a tweet correcting their…
By Kim Jarrett (The Center Square) Several states have already banned or are considering banning…
View Comments
Yeah Right a Demonrat use Common sense to combat a virus. Like the Mask restrictions, it was mandatory to wear masks, that hada Warning sign on it, that said " These Masks will not Protect the wearer from Viral Infections " now what was COVID again?