Chuck Ross on October 13, 2019
Rep. Adam Schiff said Sunday that the House Intelligence Committee might not need to interview the CIA analyst who filed a whistleblower complaint against President Donald Trump, a reversal for the Democrat, who has come under fire for failing to disclose the whistleblower’s contacts with his office.
Schiff acknowledged he initially supported the whistleblower testifying about the Aug. 12 complaint, which centered on a July 25 phone call Trump had with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky.
“Given that we already have the call record, we don’t need the whistleblower who wasn’t on the call to tell us what took place during the call, we have the best evidence of that,” Schiff said on “Face the Nation.” “It may not be necessary to take steps that might reveal the whistleblower’s identity to do that, and we’re going to make sure we protect that whistleblower.”
The Democrat has slowly pulled back his preference for the whistleblower to testify after it was revealed Oct. 2 that the CIA analyst had contact with a Schiff aide prior to filing the complaint Aug. 12.
In interviews leading up to the release of the whistleblower complaint, Schiff implied he had no insight into who the whistleblower was, or what they were alleging.
Margaret Brennan, the host of “Face the Nation,” did not ask Schiff questions about his office’s interactions with the whistleblower. She asked Schiff in the closing seconds of her show if he regretted saying in an interview Sept. 17 that “we have not spoken directly with the whistleblower.”
“We would love to talk directly with the whistleblower,” Schiff said in that interview.
Schiff said Sunday he should “have been much more clear” about his office’s contacts with the whistleblower.
Schiff acknowledged Sunday that he initially wanted the whistleblower to testify, but that he has changed his mind after Trump “started threatening the whistleblower and threatening others.”
Schiff noted Trump has referred to the unidentified whistleblower as a spy and traitor.
“Our primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected. Indeed, now there’s more than one whistleblower, that they are protected,” Schiff said.
House Democrats have given indications that they were shifting away from pushing for the whistleblower’s testimony.
House Democrats were considering disguising the whistleblower during any potential interview in order to prevent Republicans from leaking the whistleblower’s identity, The Washington Post reported Tuesday.
A Republican source familiar with the matter told the Daily Caller News Foundation in response to that report that it appeared Schiff was “laying the groundwork” to announce the whistleblower will not testify, “and to blame that on Republicans.”
“Schiff may not want the whistleblower to testify anymore because the whistleblower would have to reveal more details about this cooperation with Schiff,” the Republican source told the DCNF.
The leftwing pro-war populace on social media expressed outrage when X CEO Elon Musk pointed…
By Kenneth Schrupp (The Center Square) California Senator Dianne Feinstein, died in office at 90…
Earlier this week, we reported that fans were concerned about the singer Britney Spears after…
By Philip Wegmann for RealClearWire Nothing stood still as President Biden told supporters that democracy,…
The country music star Toby Keith has been battling stomach cancer ever since the fall…
New York City's illegal immigrant problem is so bad that they are handing out fliers…
View Comments
congress needs to interview Schiff, under oath.
I believe Schiff invented the so called whistleblower. He never really existed except in Shifty Shiff's mind.
How can a "CIA analyst" record the President of the United States in any conversation? I didn't think the CIA watches all calls Trump makes. Did they get a warrant to tap his phones. How did they know who was speaking to, and what time the call would go through. Why didn't they record obummer when he was talking 150 billion to Iran?
You are absolutely correct. How Schiff is still in control of this committee is mind blowing.
IS there a whistle(gossip) blower?
No Witness.... No crime..... end of the FARCE.
Could you provide a link to that same video on ABC News website. Thanks
You say Biden's name came up "naturally," as if Trump had no hidden agenda, even though there hasn't been any direct evidence of corruption, and even if there was, it should have been handled by POTUS through his resources here. He has the CIA, FBI, and NSA at his disposal, or get Barr to open an investigation. Asking, or some may say forcing, a foreign nation to do his dirty work is UN-American. If "Ukraine has been investigating the Biden affair since last February, then why ask to specifically look into Biden on that phone call. At the very most, Trump could have asked for an update on the corruption investigation without using any names. And you are right that "no one is above the law" even if they are "seeking a political nomination," which also happens to be true for republicans and the POTUS, unless you support our system of government to become a monarchy? Plus, which campaign was also "soliciting dirt" from the Russians in that meeting at Trump tower?...the Trump campaign, not to mention WikiLeaks.
Maybe, but still no need to talk to the whistle blower. That's why there's an investigation into the evidence, which is the transcript, and then there will be a determination and a vote into rather it contains something "illegal" or not.
I think it's Bolton.