Petition Demanding Clarence Thomas Inclusion in Black History Museum Gains Steam

He’s only the second black man to serve as a Supreme Court Justice. He’ll soon pass Justice Thurgood Marshall as the longest-serving black justice. He has received the Francis Boyer award, an honor bestowed upon “individuals who have made exceptional practical or scholarly contributions to improved government policy and social welfare.”

Yet, Clarence Thomas still finds himself excluded from the National Museum of African American History and Culture in the Smithsonian.

Worse yet, the only mention of Thomas in the museum is tangentially as part of an exhibit on Anita Hill, who accused him of sexual harassment in the early 1990s. A story which had several holes and little basis in fact.

Americans are now calling for Thomas to earn his rightful spot in the museum, circulating a petition that has garnered well over 16,000 signatures.

“Justice Clarence Thomas is the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court and a steadfast conservative who protects our closely held freedoms,” the petition states. “He has established himself as one of the brightest legal minds of his generation, yet the newly opened National Museum of African American History and Culture fails to include any mention of his numerous accolades.”

Via the Washington Free Beacon:

More than 15,000 people have signed a petition calling for the Smithsonian’s recently opened National Museum of African American History and Culture to include Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.

The StandUnited petition asks the museum’s director, Lonnie Bunch III, not to exclude Thomas because he holds conservative views, the Washington Times reported Wednesday.

“Curators at the museum singled out Thomas due to his unique views on race and his conservative thought that the federal government is the greatest threat to our individual liberties,” the petition says. “The museum highlights people of less noble endeavors, and it is unfathomable to think the curators were not open-minded enough to include all historically significant African Americans, no matter their political beliefs.”

Thomas’ contributions to the court are numerous:

https://twitter.com/johnpelwood/status/791274665326940160″ target=”_blank

Thomas joined the Supreme Court over 25 years ago, and still has to fight to have his legacy recognized. Why? Perhaps the Justice summed it up best in his own words during a commencement speech to Hillsdale College.

“I admit to being unapologetically Catholic, unapologetically patriotic, and unapologetically a Constitutionalist,” he said.

“Do not hide your faith and your beliefs under a bushel basket, especially in this world that seems to have gone mad with political correctness,” Thomas added.

The world has only gone politically correct for one side of the aisle, as there is no reason to exclude such an accomplished African American Constitutionalist from a museum dedicated to honoring prominent African Americans.

The museum can’t continue ignore what Clarence Thomas has done for America. And maybe the radical left should remember this powerful message from Justice Thomas about racism in America:

Comment: Do you think Clarence Thomas belongs in the National Museum of African American History and Culture? Tell us what you think below.

Rusty Weiss

Rusty Weiss is a freelance writer focusing on the conservative movement and its political agenda. He has been following and analyzing the political climate for several years, and his writings have appeared in the Daily Caller, FoxNews.com and more.

View Comments

  • You guys are insane. The man is obviously qualified ONLY as a political choice, contributes nothing to the bench and is a sexual harrasser. You want to honor him? Puh-lease. I read the political insider for insights into the right's point of view, but this time? You have lost your minds.

  • The racism that is being applied against Justice Thomas, preventing his recognition in the "National Museum of African American History and Culture", reminds of the reverse racism that was applied in the fraudulent award of the Nobel Peace Prize to the alias, Barack H. Obama.
    As of today, no verifiable evidence has been published to indicate that the alias, Barack H. Obama is qualified for either POTUS or the Nobel Peace Prize.

Recent Posts

Don’t Believe the Hype: Woke Is Real and It’s Dangerous

By J. Peder Zane for RealClearPolitics He’s woke. She’s woke. So are they, them, ey,…

2 days ago

MSNBC Defends George Soros, Says Criticism of Globalist is ‘Extremely Dangerous to Our Democracy’

MSNBC's Joy Reid took on the task of attempting to make left-wing billionaire George Soros…

2 days ago

‘Running Again’ – Hillary Clinton Mocked Over Video Skit Announcing New Gig Teaching Foreign Policy at Columbia

Hillary Clinton was mocked on social media after a video skit was released by Columbia…

2 days ago

Author Matt Palumbo Exposes in New Book How the Left Weaponized the Fact-Checking Industry

Conservative author Matt Palumbo, who is responsible for such titles as "The Man Behind the…

2 days ago

National Hockey Team, Various NHL Hockey Players REFUSE To Wear Pride Jerseys

Due to a Kremlin anti-gay rule that could put Russian sportsmen at risk once they…

2 days ago

Biden’s Sexual Assault Accuser Tara Reade Will Testify Before Congress, Says MAGA Rep Matt Gaetz

Representative Matt Gaetz reveals that he and Marjorie Taylor Greene have invited Tara Reade, a…

2 days ago