Kentucky Sued Following Voter Fraud Investigation

Debating voter fraud truly is an interesting experience. You need a photo ID to rent a car, purchase alcohol and tobacco, apply for welfare, rent an apartment, buy a home, and countless other things. Yet it’s suddenly “racist” to require an ID for voting?

We’re told that Republicans only favor voter ID not because of voter fraud, but to disenfranchise voters who simply can’t obtain a photo ID. Indeed, Democrats truly believe a solid block of those voting for them are apparently too incompetent to get themselves a government-issued photo ID. Given you (usually) need an ID to apply for a job, and certainly need one to apply for welfare, it’s unclear what exactly these people are doing all day.

A common talking point from the left is that the documented cases of voter fraud are low, but of course there are few documented cases when we do literally nothing to protect against voter fraud. In a state that doesn’t require a photo ID, how do you prove someone’s lying? You don’t. If 10 people are ticketed for speeding in a day, does that mean only 10 people sped? Of course not.

Part of the reason Democrats fear further investigation into voter fraud is because they know evidence will be found.

As we reported on previously in August, it has since been discovered that in California there are 11 counties that have more registered voters than citizens. Ten out of the eleven voted for Hillary Clinton (shocker!) – and those are just eleven counties in one state. The situation of Pennsylvania was similar, according to the Associated Press, which reported that “non-citizen immigrants may have cast 544 ballots illegally in elections spanning 18 years in Pennsylvania, state election officials said Wednesday.”

And that’s not all!

According to Judicial Watch, the organization has filed a lawsuit “against the Commonwealth of Kentucky over its failure to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voter registration lists. The lawsuit alleges that 48 Kentucky counties have more registered voters than citizens over the age of 18. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Central Division (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Alison Lundergan Grimes et al.(No. 3:17-cv-00094)).”

More from the report: “Kentucky was one of 12 states to which Judicial Watch sent notice-of-violation letters this year threatening to sue because they have counties in which the number of registered voters exceeds the number of citizens of voting age. Both the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) and the Help America Vote Act require states to take reasonable steps to maintain accurate voting rolls.”

Officials in Kentucky claimed that the lawsuit is without merit (of course). A spokesman named Bradford Queen told Fox News that “We are confident the facts will prove Kentucky is following the law and doing its due diligence to protect voters’ rights and franchise.”

He continued;“Judicial Watch is a right-wing organization masquerading as a citizen advocacy group, and a majority of its lawsuits have been dismissed,” Queen said. “In reality, Judicial Watch wants to make it harder for people to vote, and the Commonwealth and its State Board of Elections won’t bow to their efforts.”

Judicial Watch wants voting to be done correctly. This isn’t a voter suppression effort.

What do you think? Is Judicial Watch right to sue Kentucky? Tell us your thoughts below!

Read this Next on ThePoliticalInsider.com

Roy Moore Tears Into Al Franken and Mitch McConnell After Groping Revelation

COMMENTS POLICY: We have no tolerance for messages of violence, racism, vulgarity, obscenity or other such discourteous behavior. Thank you for contributing to a respectful and useful online dialogue.

19 Comments

Newest

Oldest Most Voted

Inline Feedbacks

View all comments

Guest

3 years ago

250.000 needed cleaned from the voter rolls but the Dems stopped it from getting done in time. We must have voter ID at once!

The Dems are the party of criminals of course they cheat!

4 years ago

I would guess that the Texas changes disenfranchised a lot of American citizens with brown skin who only speak Spanish.

You do know that our Constitution grants citizenship to everyone born within the United States? There is no voting requirement based upon skin color or language spoken.

In 2006-2007, OK & AZ activated versions of everify. Obozo sued those states – remember? Anyway, Texas was suddenly enundated with non English speaking brown skin “immigrants”. Texas tried for a voter ID law, but feds shot it down. Polling sites were so over crowded with messkin voters – all voting for obozo – that the polls were kept open for hours past the normal closing time.

Skip to 2016 voting cycle.

Texas now has a SCOTUS approved voter ID law and it was extremely rare to see a brown skin Spanish speaking voter at the polls.

BUT – demoncraps exclaim – this does not prove voting fraud occurred. WHAT DO YOU THINK? demos are still screaming it is racist to demand counties “clean up” voter rolls and eliminate dead people and others not qualified to vote in Texas.

You know, cheating is not hermetically limited to Democrats. There are Republicans who cheat. What say you, Mitch?

The solution seems simple to me – you create a voter register and if you are not on it, you can’t vote. It’s your responsibility to ensure you are on it and the appropriate checks are done at the time you apply for inclusion.

I am so tired of the Dumbocrats making noise against ANY AND ALL common sense !!! They cannot be American !! What is wrong with these people.?? They fight against ANY AND ALL integrity in our system.. and what slays me is…. THEY HAVE A ” HOUSE ETHICS COMMITTEE” !!! Are these positions held by the dead people that vote ??? WAKE UP, GET UP, AND GROW UP…YOU ARE SUPPOSED TO BE RUNNING A COUNTRY AND REPRESENTING “CITIZENS” OF THE UNITED STATES…….. or do you care….???????