It’s ‘Adios!’ to ‘Aloha!’ as the Left-wing Word Police Strike Again

I like to consider myself a lover of language and words; you have to be if you are a writer and especially if you are a prolific reader. I spent a large chunk of my adult life traveling the world. While I am not fluent in any other language besides the one I grew up with, I tried to pick up a few words and phrases here and there from the various countries I visited.

But according to a writer for USA Today, if you don’t speak the native tongue, you shouldn’t use words from other languages, whether in good faith or not. Yet again, no doubt an overpaid liberal pundit is trying to tell us what we should and, more importantly, should not utter from our mouths.

Where I come from, that’s called censorship. Where I come from, I have a certain inalienable right to free speech, whether or not it hurts your delicate sensibilities. So let’s look at this recent attempt to tongue-tie the masses.

Sticks And Stones

The article that caught my eye comes from USA Today writer David Oliver, an entertainment, lifestyle, and wellness reporter who naturally also covers diversity, equity, and inclusion issues.

In his piece, he warns against using words like ‘aloha,’ ‘hola,’ and ‘shalom’ if you aren’t Hawaiian, Hispanic, or Jewish.

Mr. Oliver explains:

“Just because you can say something doesn’t mean it’s always appropriate.”

This is a fact, David, but your ilk continues to spew nonsense every day; it’s a good thing you live in a country that allows you to say ridiculous things even though it’s often inappropriate.

Mr. Oliver goes on to say:

“If you’re not Hawaiian and you say aloha, it could come off as mockery.”

Kind of like when people make fun of the vernacular of southern Americans or those citizens who, for various socioeconomic reasons, tend to reside in trailer parks? Oh wait, we only care about hurting the feelings of people with skin color. 

Y’all better mind your tongues, or else you may hurt someone’s feelings.

It’s About Control

What people like Mr. Oliver are doing by feigning concern over possible offenses that groups of ‘marginalized’ people might feel is actually attempting to exert control over the masses.

For example, Mr. Oliver says in his article:

“The use of certain words requires education, knowledge and the foresight to understand when they should – or shouldn’t – come out of your mouth.”

Says who? All the education in the world hasn’t stopped you, David, from thinking it’s acceptable to advocate for policing what words can be uttered from the mouths of free people. 

Seriously, none of what he says is true. The beauty of having freedom of speech is that I can say whatever I want regardless of the possible personal emotional injury it may or may not cause someone to whom I may or may not even be speaking to.

This reminds me of an encounter with an old coworker from a previous life who scolded me for saying a particular character in a novel series was my ‘spirit animal’ because, as she put it, “We don’t say ‘spirit animal’ anymore because it culturally appropriates the Native American culture.” So who are ‘we’?

I signed no contract or agreement allowing some other entity to control how I use my tongue. And who says I’m not a Native American? Seems presumptive to assume I don’t have any of that lineage, and Native Americans aren’t the only culture that believes in spirit animals.

I would argue I can say ‘spirit animal’ because of my Celtic background. But primarily, I can say ‘spirit animal’ and various other phrases because I’m a free person on this planet and no one but myself governs my mouth.

RELATED: Woke on Steroids: Vanderbilt University Prof Claims Math is Racist White Supremacy and Anti-Gay

The Destruction Of Debate

Associate professor at Ohio State University Sunnie Rucker-Chang added to Mr. Oliver’s article by stating:

“Language is really about power.”

Indeed language does have power, and when we allow people to dictate what we can and can’t say, we are giving the power away to the establishment. Countering the argument, the appropriately-named Cherise Trump, executive director at Speech First, rightly explains the slippery slope of banning words:

“The more we restrict and limit speech, the less diverse ideas, perspectives, and discussions will be.”

Which is precisely what they want.

All of these calls to shame us from saying words like ‘Aloha’ and ‘Hola’ is meant as a tiny cut to chip away at our ability to speak freely about what is on our minds and, most importantly, engage with one another. 

Last year, Stanford University came under fire for their ominously dystopian Big Brother-themed ‘Elimination of Harmful Language Initiative.’

This poorly worded plan included recommendations to stop using ‘harmful language’ including the following words and phrases:

  • American
  • Circle the wagons
  • Indian giver
  • Immigrant
  • Blind study
  • Gangbusters

Soon there will be no more poets, no more orators, and no more great writers, thanks to the word police.

RELATED: Democrats Rushed to Pin Monterey Park Shooting on White People and ‘Bigotry,’ But Suspect Was Asian Man

Bubble Babies

It was my brother’s generation that started this craziness. It’s because they, along with myself and others that have followed, were raised by helicopter parents and went to schools where everyone got a trophy and everyone was told they were special regardless of what they achieved. I like to call them bubble babies.

Thanks to Generation X, millennials, and now Gen Z, we live in a world where every school, business, and industry requires ‘trigger warnings,’ ‘safe spaces,’ and training on ‘microaggressions.’ But, unfortunately, the reality is in life, there are no ‘safe spaces,’ and if you can’t handle whatever the hell a microaggression is, you won’t be able to take the brutal struggle that life in general is and is meant to be.

Director of the Frederick Douglass Institute of African and African-American Studies at the University of Rochester, Jeffrey McCune, backs Mr. Oliver’s argument, stating:

“Language is too critical to our culture, that we can’t just casually use language in ways that might offend and/or even harm, do harm to certain groups of people.”

I agree with one point; language is too critical to our culture. If it wasn’t for the popularization of non-Hawaiians using ‘Aloha,’ the beautiful Hawaiian language and culture may have been lost to history.

It’s time to stop imagining transgressions or allowing the establishment to control what we say in the name of ‘potentially harmful language.’ 

Suppose we allow this sort of policing to continue. In that case, you can say sayonara to nuance, do svidaniya to open debate, and arrivederci to our fundamental freedoms. 

RELATED: New Zealand PM’s Resignation Renews Media, Left-wing Arguments About ‘Sexism’ in Politics

Now is the time to support and share the sources you trust.
The Political Insider ranks #3 on Feedspot’s “100 Best Political Blogs and Websites.”

Kathleen J. Anderson

USAF Retired, Bronze Star recipient, outspoken veteran advocate. Hot mess mom to two monsters and wife to equal parts Saint and Artist husband. Writer, lifelong conservative, lover of all things American History, and not-so-secret Ancient Aliens fanatic. Homeschool maven, Masters in Political Management, constitutionalist, and chock full of opinions.

View Comments

  • I love your summary of this article is the last sentence. The English language has always borrowed from other languages. This includes French, Russian, German, and as you point out, Hawaiian, Spanish and Italian amongst others. If we, as Americans, tried to drop all of the borrowed words from English, we would have to be silent. I, for one, like to speak freely. Thank you.

  • There are two books that foretell the tactics, strategy, and final goal of the Left/progressive/socialist/communist/Democrats, and they are "The Black Book of Communism" and "1984." In the latter words are continually removed in the different editions of the dictionary to correct reality. History too must be corrected with one kingdom always at war one day to always an ally the next. "1619" is a good example of rewriting history today. The examples are numerous.
    The goal of the left is totalitarianism. Communism is the most successful totalitarianism in modern times, so the leftists emulate it. "1984" also shows to what extent this complete control of the citizens can take. Read the history of communism and "1984," and you will know the direction of the Democrats.

Recent Posts

WATCH: Professor and Legal Insurrection Founder Reveals Why Critical Race Theory Must Be Defeated

William Jacobson, the founder the popular website Legal Insurrection and a professor at Cornell University,…

2 hours ago

Former MSNBC Analyst Malcolm Nance Named in ‘Stolen Valor’ Report, Accused of Creating ‘Chaos’ In Ukraine

Former MSNBC contributor Malcolm Nance, who famously "took up arms" against Russia by joining the…

3 hours ago

Trump Has the Perfect Job in Mind for MAGA Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene

By Dr. Derek Ellerman One complaint you'll never hear about Donald Trump is that he…

4 hours ago

AOC Becomes Latest Squad Member to Back China-Owned TikTok, Saying Ban ‘Doesn’t Feel Right’

Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) became the latest far-left Squad member to voice opposition to banning…

5 hours ago

‘Woke’ Pentagon Diversity Chief Reassigned, but Not Fired Over Racist Tweets

Like a tenacious pup, once I get a chew toy, I just can't put it…

7 hours ago

It’s Time To End Mexican Cartels’ Reign of Terror

By Beth Van Duyne for RealClearPolitics Walking down long, ornate hallways, across a grand central…

8 hours ago