Pamela Karlan, a Stanford Law School professor and star witness for Democrats on the first day of the House Judiciary Committee’s impeachment inquiry, was once so triggered by President Trump that she couldn’t bear to walk past a hotel featuring his name.
Karlan told her traumatic story to a captive audience at a 2017 American Constitution Society event.
“I came in from the airport yesterday and I got off the bus from Dulles down at L’Enfant Plaza and I walked up to the hotel and as I was walking past what used to be the old post office building and is now Trump hotel,” Karlan relayed.
“I had to cross the street, of course.”
When a colleague on the panel asked, “Are you staying there?” Karlan replied, “God, no! Never!”
Excellent work, Democrats. That’s just what you want from a witness when trying to convince the American people that the impeachment hearings aren’t a sham – somebody so mentally unstable that they can’t bring themselves to walk past a building with a particular name on it.
Simply listening to her testimony from Wednesday, coupled with the delicate snowflake story of being unable to walk past Trump hotel because she hates him so much, is enough to indicate two things.
- Democrats chose the most biased individuals they could possibly think of to further the impeachment sham and …
- There’s little doubt this woman owns over 20 cats and belongs in a white padded cell.
Karlan revealed her extreme bias throughout the hearing, but truly raised the ire of the Trump family when she chose to invoke the President’s youngest son, Barron Trump.
“The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility. So while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron,” she explained, drawing laughter from some Democrats at the hearing and befuddlement from the rest of America’s viewers trying to figure out the nonsense that just poured out of her mouth.
It took First Lady Melania Trump no time at all to post a rare tweet, completely eviscerating Karlan for her antics.
A minor child deserves privacy and should be kept out of politics. Pamela Karlan, you should be ashamed of your very angry and obviously biased public pandering, and using a child to do it.
— Melania Trump (@FLOTUS) December 4, 2019
While Democrats were parading faux ‘expert witnesses’ led by the clown show ringmaster, Pamela Karlan, Republicans were able to call but one witness of their own. Liberal law professor Jonathan Turley.
Turley showed the panel what it’s like to have a serious and credible witness speak about the facts at hand.
During his testimony, Turley slammed Democrats for lowering the bar on impeachment and pursuing an agenda based on anger towards the President.
“This impeachment not only fails to satisfy the standard of past impeachments but would create a dangerous precedent.” – Turley
Foreign policy disagreements are not grounds for impeachment!pic.twitter.com/gqRC52vQ4L
— Ronna McDaniel (@GOPChairwoman) December 4, 2019
The contrasts of professionalism were readily apparent, leading Lifezette to declare Turley the ‘winner’ of Wednesday’s testimony and Karlan the clear-cut ‘loser.’
Using Karlan, a clearly unstable witness, to try and pull the wool over voters’ eyes is yet another indicator that Democrats will do anything to stop President Trump.
Republican voters need to remember this, not only in 2020, but should the day come when a Democrat does actually capture the White House, they need to be hounded, investigated, and harassed from the moment they enter the office.
Just like the reprehensible resistance party has done to Donald Trump.