We really hope retired Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters doesn’t get a suspension for this, as he’s one of the more colorful Obama critics on Fox News today.

During a segment on Varney & Co. on Fox, Peters was so upset at having to constantly explain that Obama does not have the stomach to actually fight ISIS terrorists, that he referred to the President as a ‘total pussycat.’

Except, without the cat.

Via the Free Beacon:

Retired U.S. Army Lt. Col. Ralph Peters called President Obama “a total pussy” during a live interview Monday for what he views as his impotent response to the threat of Islamic extremist terrorism.

Peters, a Fox News military analyst, appeared on Stuart Varney’s Fox Business program to respond to Obama’s Sunday night Oval Office address on the threat of terrorism, a speech that was widely panned. Peters, a fierce critic of Obama’s national security policies, was visibly angry as he blasted the speech.

Peters said he was taken aback by Obama’s continued references to Americans not giving into their fears.

“Mr. President, we’re not afraid! We’re angry! We’re pissed off! We’re furious!” Peters said. “We want you to react. We want you to do something. You’re afraid! I mean, this guy is such a total pussy, it’s stunning! We, the American people, who he does not know in any intimate sort of manner, we want action. We want action against Islamic State.”

Watch the segment below …

Host Stuart Varney told Peters that despite clearly being “super angry,” it’s inappropriate to “use language like that on the program.”

Peters then apologized, but the raw emotion drew tremendous positive reaction on social media.

The truly funny part is that the left-wing hacks at Media Matters clipped the video in an attempt to make Fox look bad, but a majority of people seem to agree with Peters.

Peters has made other controversial, though accurate, comments in the past. He’s previously explained that the best way to tell you’re winning against ISIS is by leaving behind their ‘crying widows,’ has urged the President to develop a plan to kill every last terrorist and then ‘kill their pet goat,’ and even explained the motivation of terrorists in that killing to them is better than sex and ‘easier on the goats.’

Comment: Did Peters go too far with his commentary this time? Do you agree or disagree with what he said?